throwawaygh

165 ms·

1. 1411.▲
   by throwawaygh 7y ago

   I still can't figure out why you replied to a comment about the filibuster with a question about SFBA housing policy. The article doesn't make a direct causal link between the two. In fact, the article explicitly states that the f
2. 1412.▲
   by throwawaygh 7y ago

   Expansive essays are sometimes hard to comprehend. Setting aside a debate about the author's argument, let's just focus on comprehending his actual words. The author clearly isn't implying that the Senate's filibuster is
3. 1413.▲
   by throwawaygh 7y ago

   Huh? The author isn't writing about housing prices in SFBA.
4. 1414.▲
   by throwawaygh 7y ago

   > clear majority In the section on the federal government, he identifies the senate filibuster. The filibuster means you need a super majority of the vote in a deliberative body that's already not representative of the majority