throwawayaway

54 ms·

601.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
That's for federal agencies and a third party's server. Considering microsoft are not a third party, not a federal agency and it's their own server, I don't think that law is relevant.
602.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secrecy_of_correspondence This seems to disagree with you, seems you are required to litigate to get your rights. The blogger was french also, so that probably has a bearing on what rights
603.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
What law would deter them from doing so? They are microsoft's computers. I'm sure the EULA has them covered legally, and I bet they asked their legal team before going in.
604.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
If I had known for even a second that the reason whatsapp took so long to start up on my phone, was it uploading MY ENTIRE PHONEBOOK to their servers, I would never use it. The damage has been done, but I never will use it. I don't und
605.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
Sounds like codinghorror.com
606.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
did this number talk to this number or anything four hops in its graph. that is the extent of the "metadata" level of anonymity that is admitted to. are the folks running this query system willing to remove numbers everybody has t
607.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
Well I don't know, I doubt they care how close to home it is, provided they still get paid. The purest cynicism I ever did see was in response to the drone attacks on funerals. People cried "you're creating more terrorists&qu
608.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
you are begging the question, it's not metadata any more when they can cross reference it to deanonymise it. in my mind, snowden's documents show bulk domestic data collection.
609.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
accusing a sect of liars of telling lies, is not making things up, taking proven liars at their word is just as bad. by saying "the executive spys on the public generally in a way that acquires only metadata", he's sticking t
610.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
It's too much of a jump from one person being recorded without a warrant, to everyone being recorded without a warrant. That distinction hasn't changed at all.
611.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
There's been no proof that it is metadata, we are supposed to take liars at their word. Seems rayiner is willing to do so.
612.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=103330 Might be of interest to you.
613.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
right you are - that's what I meant.
614.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
apparently the DAC for the RCA out is 11bit - but I can't really find any definitive proof of that.
615.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
usually when people do [1] or something like that it's to a link. to my ear the audio out of the pi's hdmi port is perfectly fine. i think the DAC used in the RCA jack is probably not very good. I would pay for a HDMI audio to DAC
616.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
Chrome pinning doesn't break corporate MITM proxies. https://www.imperialviolet.org/2011/05/04/pinning.html
617.
by throwawayaway 13y ago
http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/Holocaust/black.html From the author of the book of the same name.