throwaway33381

7 ms·

31.
by throwaway33381 3y ago
It's not. It's often due to under reporting. And sometimes the blatant falsification of data. But you don't really need to do that when only a small percentage of individuals reply to your survey. And thats how you get a high
32.
by throwaway33381 3y ago
Don't listen to him any program claining 100% retention or anything around it is falsifying their claims. Working at walmart or target can qualify as that. Often, the only people that report on this are the ones that find jobs which is
33.
by throwaway33381 3y ago
No school has 100% job placement. That's literally impossible. I went to a top 20 school and job placement was barely 50% but claimed it had 95%. The only reason I knew they were lying is because the one of the professors I researched
34.
by throwaway33381 3y ago
No. That just isn't true. Only 8% of students end up with jobs 10 years after. There's an IEE Report on this specific issue. It's much worse for minorities where job placement is nearly guaranteed to not occur. It's acr
35.
by throwaway33381 3y ago
This problem was researched over a decade ago. It's not really complicated, human interactions are different from bots you can't really create human like responses and for botters there is no incentive to really do so. Jagex just
36.
by throwaway33381 3y ago
No that's not it. There's a limited number of servers or worlds, the profitability for certain things doesn't scale when you're competing with other players. Writing bots doesn't work because the cost of electricity
37.
by throwaway33381 3y ago
Makes you wonder if you could get an LLM to find you common ingredients for things to make them but then I remember the chlorine gas is already easily accessible and easy to make. Surely like many things info hazards are often contained. Is
38.
by throwaway33381 4y ago
Honestly, not really a fan of earthenware pots due to how easy they are to make you can't really trust the quality of them. I know in India a lot of vendors use dung in their mixture and well... It's just that honestly you can&#x2
39.
by throwaway33381 4y ago
Ah just from how this is all written is obvious someone with a financial interest is trying to promote GPT-4.
40.
by throwaway33381 4y ago
I work as a professional writer. Editing is a part of the process but for a large portion of work, editing does not exist outside the publishing sphere. Publishers will be unable to handle the sheer load of submissions given to them by &quo
41.
by throwaway33381 4y ago
On the other note, online submissions for publishers will be retroactively filled with spam due to the ease and ability to publish and submit content. It already happened with Clarke's World. The end is coming not a revolution. Just th
42.
by throwaway33381 4y ago
No, using AI to write is basically having it do everything for you. It's not a tool it's a replacement. In the years to come several hundreds of thousands of jobs will begin to disappear from copywriters to fiction and non fiction
43.
by throwaway33381 4y ago
Korea I think.
44.
by throwaway33381 4y ago
ah froze my computer while i wasn't looking
45.
by throwaway33381 4y ago
True. But the average Korean was also around and often under 4 feet tall up until the 1950s. So yeah. Now depending where you are they average 6 feet. And well, they haven't been ethnically replaced. So unless the Koreans have a magic
46.
by throwaway33381 4y ago
Ehh you can't draw that conclusion. North and South Koreans have a 7 height difference of 6 inches. What's more likely happening here is that the Milanese diet has no changed since the Roman Era. Or has to changed very little in m