throwaway314155

5 ms·

61.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
It’s obvious from the subtext and the point that the movie is trying to make. The metaphor is that sometimes you fall in love with someone who outgrows you. I believe they even originally had a more “robotic” voice actor but changed it to S
62.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
What do people involved with the production of the film have to say about it?
63.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
Am I the only one who vehemently despised this movie?
64.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
Coding agents with full automation like this require a different workflow that is almost purely conversational compared to Cursor/Windsurf/VS Code. It requires more trust in the model (but you can always keep Cursor open off to th
65.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
I’m failing to see any distinction.
66.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
Less than a quarter of the way through the article: > Worse, the deaths are non-random in other ways—they tend to occur at particular times! Just the scheduling of deaths cost Light 6 bits of anonymity
67.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
Sort of a strange article. You don't see that many people _not_ praising --dry-run (speaking of which, the author should really learn to use long options with a double dash).
68.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
Indeed the first half is supreme. I really enjoyed watching Light's downfall though.
69.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
Couldn’t disagree more. Both the manga and the anime are masterpieces.
70.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
Have you seen the show/read the manga? That's precisely the first tactic L uses against Light - he broadcasts that he has precise knowledge that he's somewhere in the Kanto region of Japan based on this timing. It's also
71.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
That bit hadn’t been edited in when I wrote my comment.
72.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
How exactly are the ports "exposed" if they can't be bound to an interface?
73.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
You have NPD or something. Hope you reach out to professionals at some point. Your attitude is unsustainable. I look forward to your disproportionately rude response.
74.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
I'd say minification/summarization is more like a lossy, semantic compression. This is only relevant to LLM's and doesn't really fit more classical notions of compression. Minification would definitely be a clearer term,
75.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
The "How we're building responsibly" section has nothing to do with acting responsibly. It should be called "Limitations" instead. Section reads LLM generated honestly.
76.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
Guy clearly hasn't used a coding agent e.g. Claude Code.
77.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
How much compute was ultimately required to get this done?
78.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
By performance, I meant the accuracy of the model, not the runtime/memory characteristics.
79.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
PyTorch MPS is about 10x faster per the README.md.
80.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
That doesn’t tell you if the new method continues to perform better at higher parameter counts.
81.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
> Tool-assisted speedruns long predate LLMs and they're boring as hell You and I have _very_ different definitions for the word boring. A lot of effort goes into TAS runs.
82.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
For what it’s worth, I wasn’t angry.
83.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
> 2. Join a religious organization. Go to church, but also join the mens/womens group, join a bible studies class. Attend every week. So no atheists then?
84.
by throwaway314155 8mo ago
Didn’t they work around this last week by just putting “You are Claude” in the system prompt?
85.
by throwaway314155 9mo ago
This clarifies nothing?
86.
by throwaway314155 9mo ago
> All the Apple engineers and other visual designers get quite defensive really quick Is there evidence of this?
87.
by throwaway314155 9mo ago
Well there were victims and they're still around so... A joke isn't funny if you're "punching down"
88.
by throwaway314155 9mo ago
> Like the gifted kid who lives with his mom at 30, at some point in time, we have to stop talking about potential and start talking about results. This is an entirely unnecessary jab. There’s a whole generation dealing with stuff like t
89.
by throwaway314155 9mo ago
Well you said "is this any _worse_" (emphasis mine) and I could only assume you meant ethically worse. At which point the answer is kind of obvious because Google hasn't proven to be the most ethical company w.r.t. user data
90.
by throwaway314155 9mo ago
Since when is Google the model to emulate?

More ›