throwaway20875

10 ms·

61.
by throwaway20875 6y ago
>CPI is inflation Lol
62.
by throwaway20875 6y ago
>Yes, you can argue that Twitter exhibits double standards in some instances. But it has nothing to do with the original debate you and I were having which is - what was the reason Greenwald's article was not published. It absolutel
63.
by throwaway20875 6y ago
>That is false. The suppression on Twitter was based on the argument that the data was allegedly hacked, was not verified and they were being cautious. You are also ignoring the fact that even conservative leanings sites like Wall Street
64.
by throwaway20875 6y ago
>The argument was never about whether a story like that was news worthy or not. That's an interesting take. Articles and mentions were suppressed near IMMEDIATELY on Facebook and Twitter followed by waves of accounts bannings. Man
65.
by throwaway20875 6y ago
>You can click through and the article in question was Greenwald attempting to give oxygen to GOP propaganda about Hunter Biden. Photos of drug fueled sex romps with prostitutes by the president's son are newsworthy. Same goes for
66.
by throwaway20875 6y ago
>Being “right” but unconvincing because of abrasiveness is just screaming into the void, or worse, into an echo chamber. If he can’t create an article that wins people over with reason then why write the article at all? Good question. P
67.
by throwaway20875 6y ago
Matt Taibbi is pretty good.
68.
by throwaway20875 6y ago
>I'm honestly surprised more folks haven't seen through his shtick yet, as they saw through Taibbi's. They're right though. One-eyed men in the land of the blind. Being right matters more than a politely crafted mes