throwaway0x7E6

89 ms·

391.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
>There’s a confirmation box. It’s designed to stop users in a situation like mine from doing something stupid. It tells you that “You will permanently lose all stars and watchers of this repository.” That’s pretty scary. >The problem
392.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
are you people seriously under the impression that trademarks and such make any difference if a big US corporation wants to fuck you? they can sue you out of existence for violating laws you aren't subject to and/or EULA you'
393.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
it's hilarious to see reddit/HN types spit out neocon warhawk soundbites like that when something hits a nerve
394.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
right, I'm sure that people who write low-level libs will be thrilled to optimize them for 0.1% of the iGPU market
395.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
it is undeniable that it was a step in the direction Ukraine is currently heading in, yeah
396.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
ah, I was wondering why did this comment chain get flagged so long after the fact
397.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
yeah sure, 90% of 50% of eligible voters in the US are gun-crazed maniacs. and still, his record is minus one war, unlike every other president all the way back to... shit, I can't even tell without looking it up. I wasn't even ar
398.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
yeah, things like McCain hanging out with the Euromaidan crowd in 2013 is not enough of a smoking gun. he just did it as a private citizen, same as he did with Syrian rebels. he was just quirky like that, right? >If the U.S. is so powerf
399.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
I don't intend to, and yes, hopefully we won't
400.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
well alright, I stand corrected still tho, senators' and millionaires' sons aren't the E-rank grunts driving the trucks
401.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
sure, and if you go back in time far enough, you can say that generals get killed in combat too how many logistics and support personnel casualties did the US have in any war during this century?
402.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
sure, but not in combat roles and while sure, those 6 or 8 or whatever out of 10 army people per 1 grunt do contribute a lot, they don't get shot at. no risk, all reward
403.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
I didn't mean the russian propaganda. I meant the western media that had branded anyone with the most milquetoast traditional views as nazis for the past 7 years. The fucking canadian truckers were branded as fascists, for fuck's
404.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
>by the Russian government really now?
405.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
nobody is accusing twitter of violating the 1A
406.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
seconded. it's stellar, even better than what google used to be. feed it a cropped frame from a japanese cartoon and it returns links to illegitimate websites containing the full episode. google returns a nonsensical ML suggestion and
407.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
because it didn't happen in the US. we've long since accepted that freedom of thought in Europe is a lost cause.
408.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
just one? there are at least two that are nearly equally problematic
409.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
>While I do not foresee this being adopted in the US I won't put it past lobbyists to try. it will. and it would only take a few years of concentrated brainwash from the telescreens for the people who will oppose that to be branded
410.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
yes, they are NOT obligated to do it, so they suffer NO consequences for NOT doing it. in turn, we are NOT obligated to accept that as good or normal.
411.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
>it's been well over 3 years since the introduction of hooks in React and people still don't understand how to use them s/how/why/
412.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
sure, but then we will also halt mass immigration that's being allowed for the sake of making up for our already very negative population growth, right?
413.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
>Agency >Privacy multiple forks exist exactly because agency and privacy are not mozilla's values anymore. just half-hearted lip service
414.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
>It's extremely unlikely that github or cloudflare will ever choose to censor any content I care to share are you absolutely certain that in 5, 10, 15 years, _all_ things you do and views you express that are widely acceptable today
415.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
is this really from 2019? I could swear I saw this years ago
416.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
that would be a valid point if mozilla wasn't getting half a billion (?) a year from google and its remarkably incompetent CEO wasn't getting paid 3 million a year after having given herself a big raise while the only product that
417.
by throwaway0x7E6 5y ago
>Or the simpler explanation is that the chronological timeline isn't actually the preferred setting, outside of a small but vocal minority. you can justify a lot of things with "the silent majority doesn't mind it". t