throwaway0123_5

11 ms·

121.
by throwaway0123_5 2y ago
I don't think there is some special physical property absent in suburbs and present in rural areas that contributes to social isolation in the former but not the later. Rather I think it has to do with the kind of person that lives in
122.
by throwaway0123_5 2y ago
This is incredibly cool but it seems like the potential damage from a "hallucination" in this mode is considerable, especially when they provide examples of it going very far off-track (looking up Yellowstone pictures). Would basi
123.
by throwaway0123_5 2y ago
"Might makes right" is not only a pretty heartless ideology but one that I don't think works well most of the time. It seems like the prior application of that policy caused much of our immigration today. > if they are m
124.
by throwaway0123_5 2y ago
> I'm assuming that powering them down isn't a viable option Sadly that might be assuming too much... here and on reddit I've seen a handful of people who have said that we should continue with AI progress even if it cau
125.
by throwaway0123_5 2y ago
> Is it all that repressed guilt from invading Indian lands or something? I don't think you have to look that far back to find fairly convincing arguments that the US is the architect of much of its own immigration "problems.&q
126.
by throwaway0123_5 2y ago
> A writer after he finishes writing a book, he goes to a government office, and stamps electronically the hash signature of the book as "Human Approved". Then anyone can search the Book stamp in an internet database. Everythin
127.
by throwaway0123_5 2y ago
> Many social/legal constructs are for lack of a better term, idiotic. Step back for a second and think about what ownership actually implies? Exclusive control over a scarce resource. It implies whatever society decides that it imp
128.
by throwaway0123_5 2y ago
Ownership as a whole is a social/legal construct, no? [1] You only "own" something insofar as you control it. Societies build frameworks that aid people in controlling things based on who they think deserves control of those
129.
by throwaway0123_5 2y ago
> the book could be written by a human. I don't understand why so many people in these discussions are so keen to ignore the impact of scale and accessibility when it comes to new technology, and specifically this new technology.