throwaway-0001

7 ms·

31.
by throwaway-0001 11mo ago
Rebalancing weights?
32.
by throwaway-0001 11mo ago
I’ve seen so many humans bring stupid. Definitively there is nothing in the brain. You see how doesn’t make sense what you saying?
33.
by throwaway-0001 11mo ago
Isn’t the same with any business just a bit more indirect? So at what threshold is “Fine” and when is not? 1 to 1 cycle: bad 1 to 1 to 1 cycle: good? …?
34.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Just that the condition is that you give them 150b and if you withdraw and they Dont have you lost 150b and nothing will happen. Good luck recovering your cash from El Salvador or bvi.
35.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Profits can be a simple Ponzi scheme without a proper audit. That’s the simpler answer. Any evidence that they actually own? “ In its own attestation report for Q2 2025, Tether stated it holds about US$127 billion in U.S. Treasuries” this i
36.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
“Since at least 2017 … Tether has been assuring investors that it will get audited, though it has yet to deliver“ can you give me a single reasonable reason this was not done in 8 years? Usually the correct answer is the simplest - fraud.
37.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Someone just deleted a comment so I’ll put it again here “ Tether is backed by nothing, so it can presumably print without end. If it's suspected they've done this, it could lose its peg. If that happens, it could have consequence
38.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
If they bought bonds would be amazing. 99% chances there is not much left. We’ve been saying this for years so not sure when will crash. But definitively it’s a scam
39.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
I agree, but why you buy it then? Everyone should be allowed to price how they want it. If they price at 1m + 100k/month would sell much less. Therefore the price they charge is “reasonable” for correct customers
40.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
It “feels” same as previous commenter “feels” about AI. Can you even tell the difference in an objective way between a human vs AI regurgitating words? I kinda can tell, but far from very accurate. Well, from my experience: a few lawyers go
41.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
What was the reason before and what’s the reason now? Seems like it’s “ours” superiority.
42.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
For me it’s insulting not to use an AI to reply back. I’d say 90% of people would answer better with an AI assist in most business environments. Maybe even personal. It’s really funny how many business deals would be better if people would
43.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Which one is with evidence and which without?
44.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
This is from my experience, I didn’t do any study. What you said is not a fact either. And so?
45.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
I feel every human just regurgitates words too. And most are worse than an AI. I have countless examples of lawyers, hr and other public gov bodies that breach the law without knowing the consequences. I also have examples of AI giving bad
46.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
At least you can counter with an argument. You just seem to agree both are absurd.
47.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
So if anyone with below 120 iq gives you their opinion is disrespectful because they are stupid? —- It’s interesting that we have to respect human “stupid” opinions but anything from AI is discarded immediately. I’d advocate for respecting
48.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Yeah it’s good. Probably should be both days of revenue and days of profit to account for low profit margin companies. Or % of market cap would also be good.
49.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Could you provide your text? Having same issue for years https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45678095
50.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
I’m also self hosting gitea and pertainer and I’m trying this issue every few weeks. I appeal, they remove the warning, after a week is back. This is ongoing for at least 4 years. I have more than 20 appeals all successfully removing the wa
51.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
In my case codex fixed a bug in one shot. Took 10 min to debug and find it. Claude struggled long time and still didn’t find.
52.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
So just because the poor can do what the rich could do before what it means? Before only rich can afford to pay a pro to do photoshop. Now any poor person can get. So why when rich can is fine and when everyone can is a problem?
53.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
You couldn’t just photoshop that before ai came out? What if you get a model that is 99% similar to your “target” - what we do with that?
54.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Robots will do stuff for rich people ecosystem. The rest you know what’s going to happen
55.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
So in the end you had no objective way to differentiate from a llm?
56.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Your fist prompt was just biological. So if I make an ai with an a prompt and tell him to re prompt itself every day for the rest of his life means is smart now? Or just because I give him the first prompt is invalid? I doubt your first pro
57.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Actually I think the line between creative and regurgitate is so blurred you can’t tell me a single creative thing you did. So if 99% of people are not creative, and just regurgitate then why we keep AI standards so high? Can you show me on
58.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
Did you ever had a mainstream product and answered customer questions? You should try to see what it truly means an average person. Examples: Send email with subject “I need support” (no body). I answer by email: what you need? Reply: I nee
59.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
A human is agi when can accomplish all tasks of ChatGPT… how come the reverse doesn’t work?
60.
by throwaway-0001 1y ago
How to tell if you regurgitated this comment vs being truly creative? If you can show me objectively, I’m sold.

More ›