Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
throwAGIway
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
The createElement function is called immediately, and it immediately calls your component function. I don't think this is a significant difference. Many libraries accept a callback and I'm really not ready to call all that a frame
32.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Latest version of every browser, not every browser version I was forced to support because it was still used by a big chunk of users...
33.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
So this package is not the actual react-dom package I get when I npm install react-dom? Thanks for the correction!
34.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Casdoor is one such Docker image, or Authelia, FusionAuth, Authentik or the Ory stack
35.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Yep, it can potentially download pretty big datasets and then you can explore them entirely client side using Wasm SQLite.
36.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Yep, agreed, also excited about Wasm, it's taking so long though... I was so excited I gave a series of talks at local tech conferences about it... In 2017.
37.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
What do you think you're doing when you call render(<App />,...)?
38.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
The app I maintain is a complex analysis tool that lets you build queries, explore data and create aggregate visualizations. The state doesn't even fit into URL, and connecting it to a DB... No thanks, that's be much harder and sl
39.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Not implementing auth doesn't mean using platforms. Just use any of the many OIDC client/server libraries or completely pre-made open source dockerized services. For example react-oidc-context on the client side and Passport.js on
40.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Note that this is the full package, and that it's normal to use a bundler that will treeshake things you don't use away. For example react-dom includes server-side rendering functions that are not necessary on browser side.
41.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
I was a web developer before jQuery, during jQuery and still am after jQuery. You really want react/similar even for very small apps. I went and tried to implement a simple calculator app without any dependencies just to see if it got
42.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
That's a very un-European view that would mark you as crazy here. Nobody goes to the army to get a job, not even those who can't find a job, and the unemployment office won't try to suggest it - it's not considered a job
43.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Could you provide a link to these datasets? People always talk about data but never show it. I wanted to make an opinion but couldn't find the data at all - not counting obviously opportunistic inconclusive studies designed to support
44.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Cisco never was anything comparable to Microsoft.
45.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
I hope he kept his stock, short term dips are to be expected.
46.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Nothing with Linux or Windows approaches the battery life, thinness, weight and performance combined.
47.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Go for Preact if bundle size is your concern.
48.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
A basic React app is 3 lines of code with an optional but recommended compilation step. You can get a very complex app with 20% of the code compared to Angular. Nothing else of the big ones (React, Vue, Angular, Svelte) comes close. Just do
49.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Show me a better one... And please don't say Vue or svelte because these are just the same thing a little differently.
50.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
React doesn't have a templating language, React has syntax sugar for JS function calls - a very significant difference especially when you add TypeScript.
51.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Why would we do that? I'd rather pay more than this.
52.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Hooks are not magic, they just increment an index that's used to access the state, which is saved in an array. So you have to call the same hooks at the same time on each component function call. That's it, zero magic. Async and a
53.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Could you expand on the comparison to Munich, please? I can't imagine what could make it so much better it's worth the significant cost increase - unless you take advantage of the business opportunities I guess
54.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
The question I always have... Do you really expect people to behave like it's 1980s? Nobody - not the teachers, not the kids, not the parents want that. I went to school when mobile phones were just beginning to be a normal thing. It t
55.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
With today's technology I can do myself in hours what used to take our team weeks or months. But indeed, nobody buys stuff like that anymore.
56.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
You're doing cloud and k8s very wrong if your midrange laptop can beat it. Don't blame tools for your lack of knowledge. It's a complex tool for complex situations, it's not its job to make everything super easy for you.
57.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
I was part of such team. We supported one target only - Windows NT 3.5 and better, full-screen resolution 4:3 between 800x600 and 1280x1024, and database was the client's problem - we told them what version of Oracle they have to buy.
58.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Yeah, it's tiring.
59.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Why should I care what a protectionist government agency thinks? As a customer, I am very satisfied with the deal Microsoft offered.
60.
▲
by
throwAGIway
2y ago
Basically, users got a good enough product at no additional charge, greatly reduced costs and operational overhead, and you want the government to force users to pay more?
More ›