throw123123123

15 ms·

91.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Money is a private creation, government just made it illegal to run private money.
92.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Until gov takes away your money and then what
93.
by throw123123123 4y ago
It's in the interest of citizens to get their goods at the cheapest price. Thats why you have imports, which is no less than importing the produce of labor. With people, you have the added benefit that if people working within your cou
94.
by throw123123123 4y ago
No you don't. It would be a tariff to do so.
95.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Companies still do that by hiring abroad and importing goods from abroad. You will surprised to know most of the things you consume in the US are imported.
96.
by throw123123123 4y ago
US immigration is in the biggest crisis in decades - between rhetoric & admin burden from Trump, covid, and ossified bureaucracy, it is the worst time in history for a tech worker to migrate to the US. Each time a developer works for th
97.
by throw123123123 4y ago
What doesn't make sense is putting limits whatsoever.
98.
by throw123123123 4y ago
There has to be no federal student debt forward. If there is an admission that they dont work, stop doing them!
99.
by throw123123123 4y ago
It must be understood that making them dischargeable would make student loans unfeasible - the lending rate to adjust for the risk would be so high that unless it were subsidized it would be impossible to pay. It would give the people a way
100.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Would be better to make the debt dischargeable - it's a form of debt forgiveness that has skin in the game for college graduates, particularly those that didnt do well at all.
101.
by throw123123123 4y ago
SF prices are high so Buenos Aires property prices go up? I doubt it.
102.
by throw123123123 4y ago
An illegal immigrant cant have a bank account, credit check or buy a home. Is that what you perceive as competition in the housing market?
103.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Housing definitely is sticker than stocks - but that is a sleigh of hand. Buyers unwilling to lower prices are taking themselves off the market, not sustaining the market price. Volume would go down, and whatever is sold will be done at a m
104.
by throw123123123 4y ago
US immigration is cratering, it's a national crisis nobody cares about. The supply constraint is old but its not why housing is high - housing prices are high even in places where there is a lot of construction. Monetary policy explain
105.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Have you checked your portfolio lately?
106.
by throw123123123 4y ago
A 70% drop in demand would crater the marginal price of homes by over 70%.
107.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Diversity is a dog whistle to be honest. Either you are on the diverse team or your aren't. It's important to understand the core tribalism around picking up this word and standing by it.
108.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Why would someone pay (or take) the same between a 4-day week vs a 5-day worker ceteris paribus?
109.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Since 9/11.
110.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Only for US residents - 5% of the global pop.
111.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Banks are so regulated that you can't open an account in the US unless you visit a bank branch physically.
112.
by throw123123123 4y ago
Bay Area
113.
by throw123123123 5y ago
As an immigrant that can't ever vote, has restrictions on buying property, and belonged to a 40% immigration population in SF, i beg to differ.
114.
by throw123123123 5y ago
If this offer is rejected twitter stock will go -30/-50% so if your north start is prices this is as good as it gets.
115.
by throw123123123 5y ago
In a Malthusian model there would be a larger share of poor and starving as food becomes more abundant, because remember necessarily population outgrows food production. The Malthusian model predicts forever growing extreme poverty as a sha
116.
by throw123123123 5y ago
It is not true, as both societies with no food have kids and societes with plenty of food don't have kids. They have only a tenuous correlation at best.
117.
by throw123123123 5y ago
Economists do not cite Malthus either.
118.
by throw123123123 5y ago
You can't possibly believe the model that population grows until food is depleted at the margin, it's obviously wrong.
119.
by throw123123123 5y ago
This is so good to see! I actually was an evangelist to support comics & manga at scribd.com a decade ago with this idea. Checking it out!
120.
by throw123123123 5y ago
Malthus's arithmetic vs geometric model of population is grossly wrong, while also condemns a large swath of humanity to extreme poverty. What a clown. Paraphrasing Henry George: "Malthus model that food grows arithmetically and p

More ›