thornewolf

6 ms·

31.
by thornewolf 1y ago
Same issue
32.
by thornewolf 1y ago
I think they forgot to include the benchmark time for "npm (cached)" inside the Binary Manifest Caching section. We have bun, bun (cached), npm. I think the summary statistics are also incorrect.
33.
by thornewolf 1y ago
The gemini / gemma models all prefer to do json inside markdown blocks IME. I've adjusted my integrations correspondingly.
34.
by thornewolf 1y ago
They realized that CLI is the much better interface for these kinds of tasks.
35.
by thornewolf 1y ago
I'm actually surprised this went negative, I thought HN was gonna love this
36.
by thornewolf 1y ago
everyone takes a side on everything. explicitly or implicitly. intentionally or unintentionally. due to the interconnected nature of the world, it is impossible to construct a true-neutral position. the appearance of neutrality becomes more
37.
by thornewolf 1y ago
I'm sorry. Brain fart. Replace Tailwind V4/V5 with DaisyUI V4/V5. After re-reading double brain fart. I misread the comment as complaining about DaisyUI. I then responded as if they were complaining about DaisyUI but ALSO acc
38.
by thornewolf 1y ago
Preface: I accidentally mixed up Tailwind and DaisyUI in my brain. The commenter above me is talking about Tailwind and my "Previous Comment" is responding by talking about DaisyUI but accidentally also using the word Tailwind. Fo
39.
by thornewolf 1y ago
I haven't looked at OpenAI's ToS but try and track down a phrase called "indemnity clause". It's in some of Google's GCP ToS. TLDR it means "we (Google) will pay for ur lawsuit if something you do using ou
40.
by thornewolf 1y ago
TFA is another iteration on the wonderful semantics debate about intelligence. a rock is, a typewriter is, a computer is, a human is. all on some varying levels. TFA takes it as a given that "no thinking" happens. I take it as a g
41.
by thornewolf 1y ago
I argue that it's not that hilarious because the thinking is very tightly related. The very contemplations that lead to AI doomerism lead to pascals mugging. One of my main gripes with AI doomerism is that it is downstream of being pas
42.
by thornewolf 1y ago
Self-help books are useful, not because they have "mind-shattering ideas", but because they collect a lot of self-consistent and reasonably coherent advice into the same place. In this same way, the rationalist knowledge seeking s
43.
by thornewolf 1y ago
I attended Manifest to meet some rationalists. I consider myself a post-rat. I also heard some comments that Manifest was less Rationalist-y than LessOnline but w/o the additional commentary on "dummies" (not meant to imply y
44.
by thornewolf 1y ago
> is qualitatively different from a robot yes. > To reduce a system to its inputs and outputs is fine if those are all that matter in a given context we argue that this indeed is all that matters > but in doing so you may fail to u
45.
by thornewolf 1y ago
looks very fun excited to try it out
46.
by thornewolf 1y ago
nooooo the side project ive put off for 3 years
47.
by thornewolf 1y ago
This is a fair critique. While I am merely a "LLM wrapper", I should put the product's best foot forward and pay more attention to my showcase examples.
48.
by thornewolf 1y ago
Thank you for the kind words! I am looking forward to creating a Show HN next week alongside a Product Hunt announcement. I appreciate any and all feedback. You can provide it through the website directly or through the email I have attache
49.
by thornewolf 1y ago
+1 to this flow. I use the exact same phrase "in extreme detail" as well haha. Additionally, I ask the model to describe what prompt it might write to produce some edit itself.
50.
by thornewolf 1y ago
It is very sensitive to your input prompts. Minor differences will result in drastic quality differences.
51.
by thornewolf 1y ago
The co-drawing is definitely not a fully fleshed-out product or anything but I think it is a great tech demo. What don't you like about it?
52.
by thornewolf 1y ago
Model outputs look good-ish. I think they are neat. I updated my recent hack project https://lifestyle.photo to the new model. It's middling-to-good. There are a lot of failure modes still but what I want is a very large co
53.
by thornewolf 1y ago
To push back on this, I consider pandas/numpy so crucial to Python as a whole they are effectively stdlib to me. I wouldn't blink at this because it would happen sooner or later. Unless is was absolutely critical the server have a
54.
by thornewolf 2y ago
GP comment is what has already happened "every 6 months" multiple times
55.
by thornewolf 2y ago
He is less concerned that people can create an evil AI if they want to and more concerned that no person can keep an AI from being evil even if we tried.
56.
by thornewolf 2y ago
We have no reason to believe that it is not reasoning. Since it looks like reasoning, the default position to be disproved is this is reasoning. I am willing to accept arguments that are not appeals to nature / human exceptionalism.
57.
by thornewolf 2y ago
Ignore the noncompetes. Never get sued. If you do, everyone else is on your side.
58.
by thornewolf 2y ago
I have a similar experience. "A conviction to remember". I was a bit older though and playing with my toys.
59.
by thornewolf 2y ago
To be fair, the article basically says "ask the LLM for what you want in detail"
60.
by thornewolf 2y ago
for additional social proof I've been using railway since 2022 and it's been great. I host all my personal projects there and I can go from code to a url by copy-pasting my single dockerfile around.

More ›