thomastjeffery

1029 ms·

3361.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
If you like snapshots and source-based packages, you might be interested in nixos.org
3362.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
The underlying problem is that people don't read books. They read other peoples' unsubstantiated opinions.
3363.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
Since forbes refuses to give me the article unless I disable adblock, is it really worth the read to me?
3364.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
> You can still format the rest of the hard disk on another fs to dual boot, and you can still share drives with other systems in NTFS, xFAT, etc. Until that other OS has support for the new proprietary filesystem, it won't be able
3365.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
Interesting read. OS X and magsafe are the only things I believe Apple did right. With their overpriced proprietary hardware, awful EFI implementation, and lacking opengl and Vulkan support, why would I want a MacBook?
3366.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
Apple owns the patent on magsafe. That was the one feature I actually liked on my MacBook pro. I have seen to many chargers wear out, or wear out their ports. Magsafe also made it easier to connect the charger. Think how nice it would be to
3367.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
> shouldn't the American people take half my money from me? I took all of it from them. No, you did not take it from them. They willingly gave it to you. You are free to give it to them, but you choose not to. > I don't beli
3368.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
Privacy. Email considerably lacks it. So does web-browsing in general. I don't have an answer on how to get it, but it needs pointing out that this is the real underlying issue.
3369.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
You pointed out three major issues, and I'd like to try to address them, because I wholeheartedly agree with you, and I also, > love open source! I don't have any real solutions, but I want to express my perspective anyway. &gt
3370.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
I completely agree that this is an abhorrent practice, but I don't believe that legislation is the answer. Just because someone annoys you, does not mean you need to involve legal precedent.
3371.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
Ads are pollutants. When people complain about being predominantly supported by ad revenue, and complaining that people block ads, it is exactly the same as people who work in the coal industry complaining about pollution restrictions. They
3372.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
It seems like no one commenting here knows anything, so I'll just leave these here: https://code.blender.org/2015/07/blender-2-8-the-workflow-re... https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:
3373.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
Not at all true. He was wrong, but he wasn't shot down in the slightest. One of the main focuses in development right now is the workflow/UI. https://code.blender.org/2015/07/blender-2-8-the-workflow-re..
3374.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
Clearly you don't understand the GPL. A derivative of the APIs themselves would need to be licensed with the GPL, but calling the APIs would definitely not. Any content you make using blender is not restricted by the GPL (or any other
3375.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
I keep wondering when major torrent trackers like this are going to start using things like zeronet.
3376.
by thomastjeffery 10y ago
Ironically, Metallica's new album is out tomorrow. (not pointing fingers or anything, just thought I'd point that out.)