thisiszilff

21 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by thisiszilff 9y ago

   I've always seen these rules as defaults. If you break them with a purpose then it can work, but otherwise they form a good basis for your writing.
2. 152.▲
   by thisiszilff 9y ago

   You would think that we might one day get past this whole "strong vs weak" rhetoric, but therein lies the problem: we exit from the state of nature only to recreate those same conditions in a slightly more civil form.
3. 153.▲
   by thisiszilff 9y ago

   I don't know, that's why the point is relevant. Were I to know then that would be my cross to bear and I could work towards that. I don't know where you live, but where I live I'm seeing a steady decline in quality of li
4. 154.▲
   by thisiszilff 9y ago

   The improvements that our country needs are broad structural improvements that prepare us for where we are and where we're going. The idea of "bear your cross and accept suffering without malice" makes sense, but it also tend
5. 155.▲
   by thisiszilff 9y ago

   I don't think the author denied any of that history. The fundamental question posed is why do we see 50/50 male/female in tech as some kind of gold standard to known we've reached gender equality, and why does that discu
6. 156.▲
   by thisiszilff 9y ago

   It seems to be saying that left bias is "people prefer to cooperation over pure self-interest/working on their own." Obviously sometimes cooperation is in your self-interest, but its the difference between thinking that emplo