thinkingtoilet

7 ms·

31.
by thinkingtoilet 2mo ago
If you're on facebook, I don't take you're need for privacy or security seriously. I'm fine with this. Stop giving Zuckerberg more money and power.
32.
by thinkingtoilet 2mo ago
Is that because it's actually safer or is it because they don't report crimes in an honest manner?
33.
by thinkingtoilet 2mo ago
Don't forget it's constantly used to track, harass, and stalk the ex girlfriends/wives of the very fragile men in our police force.
34.
by thinkingtoilet 2mo ago
Millions of years of evolution and selection ending up at humans needing one food supply and lifestyle while modern life is basically the opposite. Endless calories. Sugar and meat everywhere. Our bodies are did not evolve for modern life.
35.
by thinkingtoilet 2mo ago
There is no debate. It is not safer. I have to worry about HIPAA compliance and despite cluad files and some restrictions in the settings.json it still will try to violate HIPAA compliance from time to time. I literally can't make a si
36.
by thinkingtoilet 2mo ago
Not only irresponsible, but seem to act like this was unavoidable and not their fault. The talk the engineers gave used a lot of passive voice. An "event happened" and not "we made a hacking machine and told it to hack so it
37.
by thinkingtoilet 2mo ago
It's all about time in the day, my friend. Do you want to secure a feature used by 100% of your users or 0.01% of your users? Which has a better ROI?
38.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
I like how he cited the current Trump administration in section about stifling decent.
39.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
I'm as skeptical of Open AI as the next guy, but what evidence could they provide to convince you? Surely it's just as easy to generate server logs and/or other items with AI to "prove" this happened.
40.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
Why is it bad if they're using other engines to produce results?
41.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
All models are increasing in price. Everything up to now has been subsidized by investors, private and public.
42.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
Because he's a psychopath who is actively making the world worse. Anyone who stands on stage with a chain saw and cuts US AID with a smile on his face is a truly horrible person. Anyone who hoards a trillion dollars while others starv
43.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
This is the proper response. I'm sure heroin feels really really really good. The amount of addicts in this thread defending their addiction is surprising. PS: Is that a Mr. Show reference?
44.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
If it actually has beneficial uses let a doctor prescribe it. Kratom is extremely addictive and should be illegal yesterday.
45.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
Let's be honest. There is a way to safely build data centers. Sensible laws could be made for them to build enough solar so they can power themselves or they are responsible for the cost of increasing capacity. Things like environmenta
46.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
Isn't it good marketing though? If I'm a young person looking to read something on the edge, maybe it's not banned where I am but if it was banned somewhere else, that's intriguing. If the consequence is more people read
47.
by thinkingtoilet 3mo ago
To make a shit ton of money.
48.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
> Why would anyone invest in drug studies? To make a shit ton of money. These things are insanely profitable. Generics exist and they're still profitable. You can get 99% of drugs from over seas and they're still profitable. Th
49.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
My recent experience with PeerTube was to click on the OpenMW released video and the video didn't load. Is that a regular occurrence on PeerTube?
50.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
Aren't we all! Man, if I could recommend anything it's walks. I'm a little bias because I live in a beautiful rural area. However, going for walks, no head phones, no phone, no videos, no podcasts, no audio books, no anything
51.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
>Get used to reading books and going on walks. As someone who does both, it's quite lovely! You might even be happier doing that than whatever it is the modern internet has become.
52.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
There is literally a video linked in the source. How about you read the article next time.
53.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
Does it matter? Should they have been kicked out of an event they were invited to for asking a reasonable question? Why are you asking about a news organization and not an extremely fragile man-baby who can't take a tough question?
54.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
What right to privacy do you have online? For the record, I am fully against this but people just throw the word "right" around. In another thread here people had a "right" to Anthropic's latest model. It almost bec
55.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/publications/TP121/how-data...
56.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
Yes. The hot water the datacenters dump destroys local ecosystems.
57.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
>bypassing for-profit operators such as western union and paypal as well as hinders corrupt government institutions from confiscating or otherwise devaluing what you own There are transaction fees so you're still paying someone. And
58.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
I think a lot of them have drank the kool-aid. They go to conferences and then some talking head from one of the AI companies gets on stage and tells them things like they don't need developers and how AI is already good enough to revo
59.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
Why is it unfair? Are you entitled to them? They released a product and you are paying for it. If you don't like the product, don't pay for it and don't use it.
60.
by thinkingtoilet 4mo ago
Net neutrality is about the public infrastructure. This is a private company. I'm not happy with what Anthropic is doing, but it's a very large and obvious difference.

More ›