thinkcomp

11 ms·

91.
by thinkcomp 9y ago
We no longer have access to RECAP data due to FLP's actions. Neither do other public access sites. One just sold itself. Another is about to shut down.
92.
by thinkcomp 9y ago
The model is RECAP before Free Law Project took over. It was backed by Princeton (which didn't spend much), had far fewer expenses (certainly no one got paid $90K a year; it was a grad student project), and moved forward code-wise via
93.
by thinkcomp 9y ago
See "District Court Opinions that Remain Hidden Despite a Longstanding Congressional Mandate of Transparency – The Result of Judicial Autonomy and Systemic Indifference" by Peter Martin at Cornell. https://papers.ssrn.c
94.
by thinkcomp 9y ago
This is true, but on the other hand, anyone who has ever been involved in litigation knows that it takes about one day to exceed 150 pages ($15) worth of documents in legal research.
95.
by thinkcomp 9y ago
It would be nice if the world were so simple. I run PlainSite, which indexes about 10 million dockets and is mentioned in the OP's post. I have experience in this field. PACER is of value not only to litigants, but also to journalists,
96.
Keeping “Free Law” Free(benedelman.org)
68 points by thinkcomp 9y ago|32 comments
97.
by thinkcomp 9y ago
https://twitter.com/AaronGreenspan/status/945716138939269120
98.
Reality Check: Credit Acceptance Corporation(plainsite.org)
3 points by thinkcomp 9y ago|0 comments
99.
Fool's Gold 2.0 (2013)(aarongreenspan.com)
2 points by thinkcomp 9y ago|0 comments
100.
Why PlainSite No Longer Supports the RECAP Initiative(plainsite.org)
1 points by thinkcomp 9y ago|0 comments
101.
by thinkcomp 9y ago
Docket: https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/36kxb8b9n/new-york-eastern...
102.
by thinkcomp 9y ago
The fact that Mark is not trustworthy is a real issue, and I've been screaming it from the rooftops since 2004 because I was actually there. In fact, it was the subject of my first post on Hacker News, for which I was ridiculed. See al
103.
AMA with Aaron Greenspan, developer of Harvard’s Universal Face Book(reddit.com)
35 points by thinkcomp 9y ago|3 comments
104.
by thinkcomp 9y ago
I have direct and very recent experience with the patent group at the firm mentioned in the article (WSGR) because my company is suing their client, but I think the following needs to be stated about all law firms. True, law is an incredibl
105.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
The case docket is here: https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/34ncju6ac/california-north...
106.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
Docket: https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/33xszihl6/new-york-eastern... Order PDF: https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/download.html?id=242131326... Related Cases: https://www.plains
107.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
This stems directly from the opacity of the California Judicial Council Technology Committee and the CCMS debacle it has generally made worse. Public comments are welcome, but secret. http://www.courts.ca.gov/jctc.htm
108.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
Theranos Litigation Profile: http://www.plainsite.org/profiles/theranos-inc/ Colman et al v. Theranos, Inc. Docket: http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/3350guyw8/california-northe...
109.
Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC et al(plainsite.org)
3 points by thinkcomp 10y ago|0 comments
110.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
Bonus companion link: Trump University and Presidential Impeachment https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2841306
111.
Cohen v. Trump(plainsite.org)
5 points by thinkcomp 10y ago|1 comments
112.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
You may be looking on the wrong site? In any event, this is why I created PlainSite: because PACER is too expensive and too difficult to use!
113.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
Delaware District Court http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/32vhjo5i9/delaware-district...
114.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
Actual court docket: http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/32vhjo5i9/delaware-district...
115.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
How about open PACER?
116.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
Dockets: http://www.plainsite.org/profiles/theranos-inc/ http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/304bu4iy6/arizona-district-...
117.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
It costs $21.60 to "search" for this case at the Delaware Court of Chancery, even if you know the case number. And another $40.00 to download a single document. The complaint is marked as confidential and is not available. Lexis-N
118.
The Cost of PACER Data? Around One Billion Dollars(free.law)
2 points by thinkcomp 10y ago|0 comments
119.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
For context on the California Money Transmission Act, on which this bill is based, see: http://www.thinkcomputer.com/20140214.cfpbcomment.pdf OCC has recently expressed interest in regulating financial technology startups a
120.
by thinkcomp 10y ago
That fraud exists (in the Valley and elsewhere) shouldn't have been a lesson of Theranos. It should have been a lesson of Enron, or Madoff, or Worldcom, or Mt. Gox... The real lesson in my view, which is briefly alluded to in the artic

More ›