thinkafterbef

10 ms·

31.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
Yes, we do! We launched 20 days ago and should soon be ramen profitable.
32.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
Deploying copy fixes!
33.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
This is happening far too often with such a vital product of the GitHub stack. Our whole business[1] relies on GitHub Actions functioning. It just sucks. [1] https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions
34.
GitHub Actions 2x as fast for half the price(buildjet.com)
3 points by thinkafterbef 5y ago|0 comments
35.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
Yes, job runs in a KVM VM. Nested KVM is supported on the hypervisor, but KVM is not enabled by default in guest OS, due to we run a guest kernel for faster booting time. We will offer an option to enable kvm kernel module in the future.
36.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
The feature pull request has been there for over a year[1], it’s nice that’s it’s released! Incoming shameless plug; if you don’t have to handle the hosting runners, but still to reap the benefits of having proper hardware(close to the meta
37.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
Hey HN, We opened up signups last week for BuildJet for GitHub Actions. We started with building a full CI with speed and the YAML config as a USP. We got 4x speed and a much better YAML config structure, but despite these improvements, we
38.
Make GitHub Actions Faster(buildjet.com)
2 points by thinkafterbef 5y ago|1 comments
39.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
Disclaimer - incoming self promotion. Actually, most points in the article are the basis on why we created BuildJet. We initially tried to solve these annoyances by creating a CI with speed and the YAML config as a USP. We got 4x speed and
40.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
Awesome work! If you want to cut the CI run time even further. I'd recommend BuildJet for Github Action. We give you managed high-performance CI runners, which cuts both your CI time and price in half. We plug right into Github Action
41.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
TillyPay? https://tillypay.com/
42.
by thinkafterbef 5y ago
We had the same kind of problem, where we saw our tests and builds take 20-30 minutes. We also noticed that our own machine could run the tests significantly faster, mainly due to that desktop CPU can easily boost the clock speed for intens
43.
by thinkafterbef 6y ago
4.1M clicks about to go down. https://i.imgur.com/0pxHInh.png
44.
by thinkafterbef 6y ago
Yeah, your right, slightly off topic, just a bit frustrated with the chrome people just suddenly reporting problems or the fact that the dashboard is very old. Didn't know about the Publish API, thanks for the suggestion will check it
45.
by thinkafterbef 6y ago
Managing chrome extensions can be so annoying. I created a Chrome extension a couple of years ago, and the Chrome Webstore Dashboard was so annoying and non-maintained. The Chrome API's are quite nice though.
46.
by thinkafterbef 6y ago
Amazing idea! Love shooting down stupid DOOM Elements. Good shout!
47.
by thinkafterbef 6y ago
Normally you install C/C++ libraries via system package manager like apt, or via your own script. So in deltaci's config it will look like this: steps: - run: apt install -y libxyz-1.1 when: first_run or steps:
48.
by thinkafterbef 6y ago
Modern package managers have already made sure this doesn't happen. Take npm for example, it only takes what is definied in package-lock.json, everything you installed in the past is cleaned up automatically. In fact, self hosted CI bu
49.
by thinkafterbef 6y ago
Hello HN, we’re launching DeltaCI, a cloud-hosted CI built with self-hosted CI performance. In our previous day jobs, we sometimes see ourselves keep hitting refresh on GitHub for 10 minutes just to wait for the test to finish then we can m
50.
Show HN: DeltaCI: Bare Metal CI/CD with much faster builds(deltaci.com)
17 points by thinkafterbef 6y ago|5 comments