thiht

50 ms·

961.
by thiht 3y ago
You’re confusing TLDs and domain names.
962.
by thiht 3y ago
> The sprint goal is not a contract I kinda disagree with that. We recently switched to a sprint mode « undercommit, overdeliver ». The objective is to not commit to a lot for the duration of the sprint (ie. something we 100% know we can
963.
by thiht 3y ago
Depends on your use case. In my house we don’t turn on the big light, we use 3 lamps that make a nicer light. I can turn them on all at once from my sofa when it starts to get dark.
964.
by thiht 3y ago
But if your Nextcloud password gets leaked, your Bitwarden is safe. Not sure what you mean?
965.
by thiht 3y ago
It depends on your threat model. If my Bitwarden vault gets leaked AND their encryption gets broken, I’m fucked anyway. So I might as well just store my 2FA keys in it too. I’m more interested in protection against keyloggers, and leaks fro
966.
by thiht 3y ago
> is something that I feel the wish that out-of-the-box Firefox had just a tiny bit more polish about Honestly I'm mad at Firefox for missing this train. They saw the success of vertical tabs extension, so it was a perfect feature
967.
by thiht 3y ago
If I remember well the operations of the root DNS are delegated to other companies/organizations (Verisign for example). I don't know how easy it would be to insert lies in the root DNS servers, without it being spotted, and witho
968.
by thiht 3y ago
Sample size = 1 In my life I've always come back to Firefox at some point, for various reasons. But I'm currently NOT using it anymore: - on my personal laptop I'm using Safari because battery life is my #1 priority, and Safa
969.
by thiht 3y ago
The ICANN has no governance over ccTLDs, so not doable.
970.
by thiht 3y ago
It's not lock-in, it's feature differentiation. Other platforms are free to develop their alternatives of these plugins. There's nothing preventing the community to develop a fully OSS Liveshare or Remote extension (and they
971.
by thiht 3y ago
So what? You use the plugins available on the platform you use, that's standard practice. Would you complain Sublime Text plugins are not available on VSCode? Or emacs plugins are not available on vim? This is not lock-in, just a diffe
972.
by thiht 3y ago
> I don't like being sucked back into the Microsoft ecosystem You’re not though, there’s no lock-in.
973.
by thiht 3y ago
I don’t see how this is worse than Make? This just shows that Taskfiles offers nicer syntax for some cases, but let’s you degrade to… something that looks just like Make actually, a variable initialized from a shell call
974.
by thiht 3y ago
This is not about safety, this is about ticking boxes. Boxes that make sense, but which are irrelevant compared to the potential impact of the change. For example, replacing the constant with a file parameter is important, but completely ou
975.
by thiht 3y ago
Thank you for StrictYAML! I wish it was the standard
976.
by thiht 3y ago
In bad faith, yeah probably. $@, .PHONY, and the implicit target/dependency syntax is clever, terse, but NOT clear.
977.
by thiht 3y ago
> What if you use `embed` You can add the embedded files to the "sources" list, no issues > Why rebuild the binary if you've only touched test files Yep, this is a thing not currently supported by Task, but they're
978.
by thiht 3y ago
My memories must fail me, I thought it was a BSD make vs GNU make issue but probably not! Maybe a version issue between the bundled make binaries on each platform, I don't remember the details to be honest
979.
by thiht 3y ago
One day after writing a complex Makefile and getting frustrated because 1) it was hard to read and reason about because of make weird syntax, 2) it didn't run on CI because it uses GNU Make instead of BSD Make on my MacBook, I thought
980.
by thiht 3y ago
Because Makefiles are so clean and legible. Taskfiles have the benefit of being very explicit and easy to understand.
981.
by thiht 3y ago
If you don't know what's wrong with make, just use make. But it probably means you probably don't USE make. If your Makefiles look like this: build: go build -o dist/app You might as well just use make, i
982.
by thiht 3y ago
If you think there’s nothing to fix with make, you’re severely mistaken. The differences between GNU Make and BSD Make are for me a big reason to be extra careful when using it. Make also relies a lot on cleverness so it comes with lots of
983.
by thiht 3y ago
Of course it has its place. Not for a blog though, it makes no sense
984.
by thiht 3y ago
I have no idea why anyone would want to run K8s locally. The concept makes absolutely no sense to me. If you want to run a container, just run the container? K8s is here for scaling, not for running stuff in local.
985.
by thiht 3y ago
I decided a while ago to not use anything new coming from Google. ChatGPT and Copilot have really helped in this regard. They even helped me mostly get rid of Google Search, which was one of the last 3 Google services I use (with YouTube, a
986.
by thiht 3y ago
I have multiple mailboxes, not all in Gmail, and I want a unified way to read and write my emails. Also a local copy of the emails is nice to have.
987.
by thiht 3y ago
For you maybe. This is the number one feature I want in the email clients I use.
988.
by thiht 3y ago
> on call, with no talk of compensation bumps Is this legal where you live? In my previous team, when we got on-call it was roughly 1 week per month (we were 4 in the team), we got an on-call phone, and we were compensated 600€/week
989.
by thiht 3y ago
> it just forces a specific style on everyone which most of the time, everyone slightly hates. Just stop caring about useless stuff, gee… this is what the code review pyramid about, focus your efforts and care on important stuff, not irr
990.
by thiht 3y ago
> noone is happy I’m 100% happy with Prettier. The trick is to not care too much about how the code looks. Consistent style trumps any choice for me.

More ›