thih9

15 ms·

421.
by thih9 1y ago
Note that this joy is not unique to tech. Carpenters, farmers, painters, etc, all make things that didn’t exist before. Some of them haven’t heard about Jira.
422.
by thih9 1y ago
Off topic, I started working in tech because I enjoyed it. That it was also well paid was a nice coincidence. You can be in the grind and be unaware of that. Of course people like this still suffer due to overexposure to work and js framewo
423.
by thih9 1y ago
This looks like something that EU might question or treat as anti competitive perhaps. Is this behavior also present in the EU? Was the legality of this in the EU discussed already?
424.
by thih9 1y ago
It’s actually safe to do that, watch owners would be distracted by global cataclysms ;) > Tides would be much smaller (…) But the movement of tides underpins the balance of ecosystems the world over, and an impact that widespread would c
425.
by thih9 1y ago
This is also the standard way to present moon phases in watch complications: > One of the objections raised to a conventional moonphase display, which shows the visible part of the Moon via an aperture in the dial, is that it is not an a
426.
by thih9 1y ago
There are other ways to litigate that the malicious/greedy can use, where MIT offers no protection; e.g. patent trolling.
427.
by thih9 1y ago
What I hear is: “The person that profits from employees who don’t prioritize money encourages employees to not prioritize money.” Unsurprising, unhelpful for anyone other than sama, unhealthy for many.
428.
by thih9 1y ago
Is there any proof that the money inside, including what is visible, is genuine and not a prop?
429.
by thih9 1y ago
What happens with the personal data that gets uploaded? Is the payload stored or used for any other purposes? Is there a privacy policy?
430.
by thih9 1y ago
> But someone can build it in a few hours, even if they're not super good at this stuff. Note that the end result is not the same as what LinkedIn would have built. Perhaps in some ways better and in some ways worse. E.g. personally
431.
by thih9 1y ago
Fair enough, apologies. In my defense, reading that for the first time gave me an impression that DDoS attacks themselves were older; I was disappointed and wanted to share so that others wouldn’t get similar hopes. Next time I’ll round mor
432.
by thih9 1y ago
Exactly, should be less. Unless we have some data about DDoS sizes in the early 90s, before the first DDoS has occurred.
433.
by thih9 1y ago
But that’s my point, I wouldn’t call it an increase from 0, I’d say 30 years ago that value was NULL - not even a zero sized DDoS has happened yet.
434.
by thih9 1y ago
> DDoS sizes have continued a steady climb over the past three decades. This is a bit misleading; according to Wikipedia[1], the first DDoS is said to have occurred less than three decades ago. [1] "Panix, the third-oldest ISP in th
435.
by thih9 1y ago
> I don’t understand how people have the time to play things by mail in realtime It's not via mail, it's via discord; there are more details in the submission: "I set up a channel on a reasonably-popular RPG discord server
436.
by thih9 1y ago
Looks great, congrats on the launch. Could you tell us more about how you made it? What libraries did you use, or did you code it with an AI?
437.
by thih9 1y ago
Science is notoriously late to discover what pet owners have known for centuries. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joROEZQz178
438.
by thih9 1y ago
Note: if you’re on iOS and want to listen to the example, disable silent mode. At least that’s what I had to do to hear the sound.
439.
by thih9 1y ago
Note that this is a very simple library and not very efficient. E.g. for the code that filters an array, it would run N prompts[1]: `You are a filter agent.\nYour job is to return whether an item matches the criteria: ${criteria}\nRes
440.
by thih9 1y ago
It can be done server side too, the old password can be sent along the new one and the server can verify it.
441.
by thih9 1y ago
Fascinating. In other words: In order to force the user to change their password more frequently (long term), the user is prevented from changing their password too frequently (short term). I wonder whether the person who added that is actu
442.
by thih9 1y ago
Original source: https://forum.cursor.com/t/cursor-yolo-deleted-everything-in... > Hi everyone - as a previous context I’m an AI Program Manager at J&J and have been using Cursor for personal projects since Marc
443.
by thih9 1y ago
I’m unfamiliar with the slang but even without it the name is weird. The “hog” alone would never make me think of a hedgehog instead of a regular hog. > a domesticated pig, especially a castrated male reared for slaughter https:/&#
444.
by thih9 1y ago
Speculation: AI companies want the cultural shift, i.e. get everyone used to having their data, art, work, etc, turned into models. Plus they want the PR, i.e. AI agents to be seen as helpful, friendly and genuinely useful. They want this t
445.
by thih9 1y ago
> emits text in these ranges that was AI generated How would you define AI generated? Consider a homework and the following scenarios: 1. Student writes everything themselves with pen & paper. 2. Student does some research with an on
446.
by thih9 1y ago
With its own wikipedia page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_that_have_...
447.
by thih9 1y ago
Context: - “Meta has a new stand-alone AI app. It lets you see what other people are asking.” https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-ai-app-public-feed-warn... (may 2025) - “People are seemingly accidentally publishing their
448.
by thih9 1y ago
This is not opt-in how I understand it. When there is no alternative, or the alternative is not using a service, I'd call it a hard requirement instead. I like how opt-in is handled by GDPR; e.g.: "Consent must be a specific, free
449.
by thih9 1y ago
I think the rules should be stricter. I’d prefer an explicit opt in from the content author being required for anyone to perform any model training with any given data. Alternatively, require all weights, prompts and chat logs to have the s
450.
by thih9 1y ago
> It's not arrogance, since they're not asserting anything about themself. But you can be arrogant without referencing yourself directly. After all, anything you say is implicitly prefixed with “I declare that”. E.g. one of Fey

More ›