Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
thibauts
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
151.
▲
by
thibauts
12y ago
This obviously is mostly smoke and mirrors. Uncle Bob recycles Separation of concerns [1] and overshadows it in the process. You won't define what are good or bad boundaries in code anymore than you will define "5 easy rules to au
152.
▲
Stability: how life began and why it can’t rest
(aeon.co)
1 points
by
thibauts
12y ago
|
0 comments
153.
▲
by
thibauts
12y ago
If you look closely in the original smalltalk definitions you'll also see that separation of view and controller was intended first and foremost as a way to swap multiple views for the same controller, assuming those views shared contr
154.
▲
by
thibauts
12y ago
This is what happens when you build a product for yourself without any regards for what people actually want. G+ was forced down our throats in a bunch of different ways and I'm glad the plan didn't work out. Google probably won&#
155.
▲
by
thibauts
12y ago
Is the problem "free will", or "I" ?
156.
▲
by
thibauts
12y ago
And unpredictability depends on the information available to the observer. Thus randomness is objectively subjective.
157.
▲
by
thibauts
12y ago
So, if I get it right, states become more and more coupled, thus entropy tends to decrease in an open system ? I'm confused.
158.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
HTTP 202 Accepted [1] does the job. [1] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10...
159.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
It's not pollution, only a market-share of your thoughts and actions.
160.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
To me the target is being able to adapt. Patterns are not bad in themselves. What make me cringe is the obsession with MVC and derivatives. That's like trying to fit everything that is merely spherical in the "ball" label. Th
161.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
What this suggests to me is that you'll be able to respond to change if the pieces of code you write can be reorganized. This happens when separation of concerns is properly handled, among other things. Change will not happen if you do
162.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
If Agile is the ability to respond to change then it's obviously a matter of good craft because software has never been made pliable with a magic methodology wand. Of course you'll never hear a consultant talk about that, becaus
163.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
The article is pretty well thought-out and documented, but I feel it's missing the target once again. Am I the only one to feel that this plethora of nebulous patterns hinder creativity and intelligence more than anything else ? What i
164.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
This is really nauseating. Which kind of world are we letting happen ?
165.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
Not everybody it out to hurt you, discriminate, or hate you. That being said, immediate reaction / assumptions cannot be treated the same way as thoughtful examination. At all.
166.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
Calling people sexist when they try to bring a valid point pretty much amounts to intellectual laziness too, don't you think ? Like it or not, our brains are wired to be able to ignore unusual cases and save complete analysis of each a
167.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
tl;dr Ive is too humble to openly admit he is/was "the man who designs tomorrow". The first and last lines say it all. This is, to me, a way to convey to the public that Apple's core is not dead with Jobs, after years of
168.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
That's exactly what I thought. I can't help feeling this is yet another "do it this way" post by a person that is big on theory but probably very low on real life in-the-field practice. You can't advise 301 when you
169.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
The unconscious may simply be related to responses to stimuli repeated and internalized enought in neural structures for us to not have to supervise them anymore. This mecanism could be put on par with abstraction in my opinion, for the rol
170.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
I think you define it very well. Self-sense building is the identification of perfect or near-perfect prediction of inputs based on outputs produced. When I move my hand on the right, the visual pattern it produces moves on the right ... an
171.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
Mathematically proving correct is possible if you have a formal mathematical definition to prove against. So what you're doing is translating the problem from one language to another. This is not the same at all as programming to solve
172.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
How many ? As far as I know, as many ratings as there are movies. Of course, the more ratings the more "accurate" is the system, if we can use such a word for a search engine that aims more for a kind of serendipity attracted by m
173.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
For those who can read french there is an interesting experiment here http://culturewok.com/lewokentravaux/cine The indexing is based exclusively on mood and the ratings are user-contributed. I can forward contacts if
174.
▲
Why Shouldn't I Work for the NSA?
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
thibauts
13y ago
|
0 comments
175.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
It's all right. If adopted, the second part has provision for protecting us from terrorists. I can relax now.
176.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
Both will sure gain from each other talents and data. Robotics for the self-driving car, and a brain for the humanoïds. Aweso... well not so much.
177.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
Congratulations, you got the sysadmin executed.
178.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
We don't program the computer as much as we program ourselves. We may be able to build tools that reduce the burden but making a computer debug itself without either re-stating the expected outcomes and/or understanding the "
179.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
It depends if you are talking about the latest Iron Man or "La Strada" from Fellini. Simple plots sometimes rest on very subtle cues.
180.
▲
by
thibauts
13y ago
We've been contaminated by greed as a community. We think about building the product that will make us millionnaires when we should be working hard to design consumer tools and protocols that avoid lock-in and promote freedom. We'
More ›