thenewnewguy

27 ms·

271.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
Correct, which is option 1 from the parent post. MisterBastahrd seems to believe that the NCAA can just say "you have to follow these rules if you join us even if you're from CA", which is not true because the bill outlaws th
272.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
> This is _exactly_ how it works for wait staff in restaurants in most states, except that is by hour instead of delivery. For example, in MA, the restaurant pays out a minimum of $3.75 (wait staff minimum wage in MA) and guarantees that
273.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
> The point is that they are demonstrably not exactly what they claim to be, and thus some level of distrust is warranted. Where does Cloudflare claim to be content agnostic?
274.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
> As someone who has browsed sites "powered by cloudflare" over Tor and been tossed into an infinite "are you human" loop, it certainly doesn't feel melodramatic. https://privacypass.github.io/
275.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
Why are they required to have committed a crime? Cloudflare isn't the government, why do you believe they're obligated to serve 8chan? Cloudflare took down one website that was directly related to a major tragedy that cost people
276.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
Minor typo on the website: "or to proof to others they should use an ad blocker" (should be "as proof" or "to prove"). Also, suggestion: don't require typing http:// or https://
277.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
Current rails developer here, I've found that using ActiveRecord for basic queries and moving to SQL for more complex stuff to be a very good combination. I agree that ORM users should learn SQL, but SQL and an ORM are not mutually exc
278.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
"I had a bad experience with Kubernetes" isn't really relevant discussion on a post about a kubernetes release. It's already well known that kubernetes is used by companies all over that don't need it and don't
279.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
> There’s no record of Eich discriminating against gay employees—“I never saw any kind of behavior or attitude from him that was not in line with Mozilla’s values of inclusiveness,” says the company’s chairwoman. Somewhat off-topic, but
280.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
The (current, I've been told this is being worked on) problem with cloudflare's registrar is you MUST use their DNS if you buy a domain through them. Great if you already do and never intend to switch, useless if you don't or
281.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
Assuming they are correct that the 'worse on paper' is the only one detected (I don't know if this is true or not) that would be the logical conclusion, yes.
282.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
> Someone "using Linux" is likely to be running various things such as SSH/HTTP/file servers, native IRC clients, random build systems (running "npm install" instills a lot of trust on the NPM repository and
283.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
In the existing legal system you can't. But we could write laws that allow this to be a thing (i.e. instead of the current situation of "you have full control over who can copy/redistribute your IP" it becomes "anyo
284.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
The supreme court is by definition correct, at least in a legal sense. Their interpretation literally is the law.
285.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
Complete outsider (literally learning about this fight via this post), but I have to admit you seem somwhat biased: > At the same time, ffmpeg merged pretty much everything, even if that lead to worse code, or security issues. Do you hav
286.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
I understand the point they're making, but I'm not putting forth the argument they're arguing against. I think companies should be banned from most forms of political speech because their goals are by nature typically harmful
287.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
This is false equivalence. Imagine if I could support a company when they help take down websites breeding hate speech and terrorists - and not support that same company if they interfered with an election.
288.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
If the hash has been leaked then why is there reason to believe the salt _hasn't_ been leaked?
289.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
Unless you're operating under the (likely incorrect) assumption that the salts aren't leaked than salting the password doesn't matter for attacking a single user - it just means you can't reuse your results for other use
290.
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
The problem, I think, is that you couldn't prove votes weren't _added_, unless there's some smart way to solve this problem. Obviously you couldn't inject too many votes or the total would seem suspicious. But considerin