thelgevold

9 ms·

31.
Big JavaScript payload reduction(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
32.
Learning how to use the Closure compiler(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
33.
Web workers in angular(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
34.
Creating the smallest Angular application possible(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
35.
Using Firebase with Angular(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
36.
Code splitting and lazy loading in Webpack(syntaxsuccess.com)
2 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
37.
Combining RxJs with Socket.io(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
38.
Webpack 2 doesn't really do Tree Shaking(syntaxsuccess.com)
4 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
39.
Creating a minimal Angular application(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
40.
Understanding JavaScript Tree Shaking(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
41.
16.6k basic Angular application(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
42.
Sql Server in NodeJs(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
43.
Optimizing Vue components(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
44.
by thelgevold 10y ago
I kept it simple to try to illustrate the main difference between the two approaches.
45.
by thelgevold 10y ago
There is a flag to tell it to process commonJS. I played with that here: http://www.syntaxsuccess.com/viewarticle/combining-es2015-mo... Combining es6 and commonJS in the same project.
46.
by thelgevold 10y ago
Closure definitely has a steeper learning curve. I also agree that it's not always realistic to use it.
47.
by thelgevold 10y ago
Here is a little bigger app as well http://www.syntaxsuccess.com/viewarticle/migrating-my-angula...
48.
by thelgevold 10y ago
I have a comparison using an Angular app here: http://www.syntaxsuccess.com/viewarticle/angular-application...
49.
by thelgevold 10y ago
Yes. Angular is working on a similar approach. Great results so far.
50.
Webpack bundling is not as optimized as I thought it would be(syntaxsuccess.com)
2 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
51.
Comparing the Closure compiler to Uglify(syntaxsuccess.com)
44 points by thelgevold 10y ago|45 comments
52.
Experiment: Finding smallest Angular application size limit(syntaxsuccess.com)
2 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
53.
How to Create a JavaScript Blog(syntaxsuccess.com)
2 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
54.
Which JavaScript framework do I chose?(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
55.
Svelte – A framework that compiles to a very small bundle size(syntaxsuccess.com)
3 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
56.
Closure Compiler vs. UglifyJS(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
57.
Using Sql Server with NodeJS(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
58.
Interesting Evaluation of Webpack Tree Shaking(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
59.
Explaining Tree Shaking in JavaScript(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments
60.
Lazy loading with Webpack(syntaxsuccess.com)
1 points by thelgevold 10y ago|0 comments

More ›