thelarkinn

11 ms·

91.
Linux Foundation joins forces jQuery Foundation – webpack newest member(medium.com)
2 points by thelarkinn 10y ago|0 comments
92.
Sustaining webpack for the future(medium.com)
8 points by thelarkinn 10y ago|0 comments
93.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
True, which is why we haven't ignore this and are hoping to add features like scope hoisting (and personally I'd love to pass the AST program that webpack's parser creates right in to closure compiler js to see how "adva
94.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
Does anyone find this search results on ISAAC CHOI ironic? (Photo shows google search results with Poker Player for online gambling site as one of the top results). Wonder where all that money went. ;-) http://imgur.com/a&#x
95.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
It's not, in the end load and runtime perf boil down more to what and how much you load up front.
96.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
Not the conventional method of using it. Is a legacy syntax, you just require the file and it will be imperitively loaded via your loader chain.
97.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
I think closure compiler is the perfect example of how saving extra 100kb is has never been worth the poor user experience. Despite the pain in setting up webpack, the result is an excellent collection of features that goes beyond just Java
98.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
> So, what do you think This is an interesting perspective! One thing to note is that you never have to import images and other assets into js to express that as a dependency!! One of the coolest features about webpack is its community p
99.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
Rollup as the new hotness for _libraries_. We know that libraries see a weak point for us as well as runtime overhead for many modules in Webpack bundles, but Rollup is just tackling one challenge and that is js perf. Webpack manages all of
100.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
Here is a up to date write-up for our proposal and review of performance in our repo https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/2873#issuecomment-...
101.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
Yes exactly! Out of the box webpack solves a bunch of really complex problems that frameworks or 10tools combined would have to solve (code-splitting, lazy-loading, multiple targets (webworker, web, node, electron, etc.). Our vision is to b
102.
by thelarkinn 10y ago
The margin in size and speed for webpack2 compared to rollup is pretty minimal ~5%. Plus we plan on integrating rollup scope hoisting after we release webpack 2.x (which is stable, however pending the finishing of our documentation)!!!