thedorkknight

16 ms·

151.
by thedorkknight 4y ago
To be fair, mofongo is indeed delicious
152.
by thedorkknight 4y ago
I don't think it'll be way too much different than it has been for most of human history. We really only had a brief blip of having video, which was generally trustable, but keep in mind that before that for thousands of years it
153.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
It literally puts a spin on it, actually!
154.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
? I'm using it right now and it's fine
155.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
Don't most covid deaths happen after you're no longer infectious? I thought a lot of that was from the cytokine storm. But to the other commenter's point, if omicron DID get a more deadly variant that kills you after you&#x27
156.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
You mean you've been paid to put fake comments about products on Reddit?
157.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
The comment you replied to says "covering it up to the extent they did" which would indeed be a theory about a conspiracy, yes.
158.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
Confused. If professor Loeb tries to at least open discourse to the idea that ET space junk might be flying around like our space junk in a desire to reduce the giggle factor around that hypothesis, what sort of "consequences" do
159.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
I mean... if you think the animals actually maliciously conspired I suppose
160.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
Who is the "They" that you all keep mentioning? I haven't heard anyone push the pangolin theory since, like, March 2020. I listen to the podcast "This Week in Virology" a lot and can only remember them occasionally
161.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
Not to mention the lunacy of assessing efficacy of drugs by reading internet forums and social media. Why do scientists bother with expensive studies when they can just read Facebook? /s
162.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
What? He points out multiple specific examples of disingenuity... Did you actually read it? He's not asking you to just trust him, as you accuse. He gives specific info, with citations/links... What specific errors did he make and
163.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
Didn't mention anything about vaccinations. Don't be disingenuous. The guy above literally said "Children aren't at risk from Covid AT ALL".
164.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
"at all"? What? Tons of children end up with post-acute sequelae. Where are people getting this notion that the only possible negative outcome of viral or bacterial infections is death and that that's the only stat we should
165.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
To the user who keeps getting comments deleted for bringing up this guy's funding: please look up "ad hominem fallacy". Attacking someone making a statement says nothing about the truth of their statement
166.
by thedorkknight 5y ago
What am I supposed to be critical of, beyond what the authors themselves are saying? Judging by your quote, are you critical of the notion that vaccines slow the spread of covid - great, but I haven't heard that as a main talking point
167.
by thedorkknight 8y ago
Or metal gear solid. "It was the distant future, 2005..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAioZzuhOQg
168.
by thedorkknight 8y ago
"trick question! There is no 'first number'!"
169.
by thedorkknight 8y ago
You could argue that all crystals travel through time