thedevilslawyer

18 ms·

271.
by thedevilslawyer 7y ago
Well if 0.1% men cared about something, and 1% women cared about it -- that's 10x difference in that priority. But still a blip overall, that can be ignored.
272.
by thedevilslawyer 7y ago
Isn't the point of sanctions to cause frustration by restrictions?
273.
by thedevilslawyer 7y ago
Not a terrible idea. Society can call this problem domain solved, and outside of the purview of copyright.
274.
by thedevilslawyer 7y ago
In the parent post's defense, open source would actually allow for looking at exactly what data is sent how. And hold the companies accountable. This would be dead easy, without the need for whistle-blowing, or reverse engineering
275.
by thedevilslawyer 8y ago
Some of the comments here criticizing the remote work concept are doing it on the following lines: 1. It's bad for SF workers - pay is worse. 2. No separation of home and work life. 3. It's lower quality work. 4. Regu
276.
by thedevilslawyer 8y ago
> without asking me how I felt about it If you enabled AMP, they asked and you answered.
277.
by thedevilslawyer 8y ago
"> bare necessities" That's highly debatable. A good part of the world lives completely fine even without this bare necessity.
278.
by thedevilslawyer 8y ago
"Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." - John Steinbeck Are you temporarily embarrassed? You may not realise it, but you
279.
by thedevilslawyer 8y ago
The workers want no notice period. The industry wants 3 months, so their benches are warm, and they can handle the buffer better. How thoroughly one side has won indicates how thoroughly the power is held. One could call it legal enslavemen
280.
by thedevilslawyer 8y ago
If the cost of multi-multi-billion dollar industry is backlash on the internet forums, that's hardly a difficult choice.
281.
by thedevilslawyer 8y ago
Your imagination should not be a good rubric for what's possible.
282.
by thedevilslawyer 8y ago
It's fine if the article does not have any actionable items. It's fine for an article to just be informative. Reduce international tourism? Sounds completely fine as a potential solution. We survived for 99.99% of our species&#x27
283.
by thedevilslawyer 9y ago
I know what you're trying to insinuate, but just to clarify, as the OP used it, resources seems like money, and cheapest means you are thrifty, you know, that things that a site like YC espouses in startups.
284.
by thedevilslawyer 9y ago
This site is for growth-hacking and lead gen, so it's disrespectful link to the content directly where leads can be missed. You should remove this link and wait for them to add in the embed in the site itself, that way they are "p
285.
by thedevilslawyer 9y ago
Because we've allowed facebook, and it's ilk, to run rampant with our personal data and identity. Let's rein them in. With force.
286.
by thedevilslawyer 9y ago
While you're clearly trolling, this is indeed a valid question. The answer: Capitalism cares about no national boundaries. Whether that's good or bad is for us to figure out. Do your boundaries lie around a state? a country? a spe
288.
by thedevilslawyer 9y ago
Maybe because you see children as human beings, capable of giving and receiving love.
289.
by thedevilslawyer 9y ago
No one ever has, doesn't mean no one ever should.