the_fury

6 ms·

31.
by the_fury 6y ago
Absolutely, yes.
32.
by the_fury 7y ago
Anecdotal, of course, but this is exactly the way I viewed things before I fully dedicated to the change in my diet.
33.
by the_fury 7y ago
I'm not entirely sure why that's strange. It's been a common term for an instance or VM for as long as I can remember.
34.
by the_fury 8y ago
If you're doing a single meal a day, that meal is always breakfast.
35.
by the_fury 10y ago
"freeloaders" is a bit of a strong term if you're not complaining.
36.
by the_fury 10y ago
Not in the slightest. I probably wouldn't initially go as far as an apology, but asking someone what they think you've done to them is a damn fine tactic in building understanding.
37.
by the_fury 10y ago
By the responses I would say yes, yes he was.
38.
by the_fury 10y ago
That would be Concrete Blonde.
39.
by the_fury 10y ago
> For A-B, finance me, I will get you evidence or disapprove myself Are you really saying that you need financing to get evidence to back up your original claims?
40.
by the_fury 10y ago
I've routinely brought up all of the unconsidered comments in retrospectives. Retros are all about making sprints better, and talking about technical problems is integral to that.
41.
by the_fury 10y ago
The entire post appears to be about female speakers being unfairly treated is because because it's a story about a female speaker who was being unfairly treated. The "look everyone" jab is completely unwarranted.
42.
by the_fury 10y ago
I'm having trouble thinking of a situation in which calling someone a milf would be anything but a "crude work-inappropriate remark".
43.
by the_fury 11y ago
A balmy -6C in Toronto.
44.
by the_fury 11y ago
I've been writing software for decades now, and I find that it's quite the opposite. Other than using an SCM, nothing has been as much of a game changer for me as automated test suites. I'm able to tackle bigger and larger pr
45.
by the_fury 11y ago
Very few of the thousands or millions of git users know more than basic usage and most do not rely on the CLI. I'd be interested to know where you get these numbers, as this doesn't match my observations at all. I generally see
46.
by the_fury 12y ago
Generally you would use an expand/contract migration pattern. You deploy a schema expansion so that both the new and old code will run, deploy the new code, and once the new code has been validated you deploy a schema contraction. htt
47.
by the_fury 13y ago
Plain Old Ruby Object