Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
theLiminator
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
theLiminator
11mo ago
Would be cool to see if they could make it play starcraft too and pit it against alphastar.
92.
▲
by
theLiminator
11mo ago
Do you know of any dishwasher powder (not pod) that's both effective and less likely to cause gut issues?
93.
▲
by
theLiminator
11mo ago
The dataframe paradigm (a good example being polars) is another good alternative that's more composable (imo).
94.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
For better or for worse fyrox is not something too novel/new. So people don't really see a reason to use it over godot or other engines. Doesn't mean bevy is better or anything, just that because it's so different people
95.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Is the main difference from https://github.com/google/wuffs being that Kaitai is declarative?
96.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
> I doubt it. C is well within 2x of what you can achieve with hand written assembly in almost every case. Depends what you mean, if you preclude using targeted ASM in your C I think some hot loops can be much slower than 2x. Of course p
97.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
lol i wonder if this will create a market for PKI at the image sensor level so that videos will be cryptographically signed and baked into the actual video stream with steganography.
98.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
The pattern you're looking for is: ``` fn operate_on_a(a: A) -> A { // do whatever as long as this scope still owns A a } ```
99.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
> Expect soulless Chinese models to fill in the gaps. As opposed to the soulful American models?
100.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Might make sense getting it to instead create a CST traversal that deletes feature flags by their id. Then you have a re-usable trustworthy tool that you can incrementally improve/verify.
101.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Is this usable with local inference?
102.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
flix also looks pretty nice
103.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Yeah, imo that's the way that python should've worked in the first place. Import-time side effects are definitely nasty though and I wonder what the implications on all downstream code would be. Perhaps a lazy import keyword is a
104.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Pretty cool, though I think in practice network latency dominates so much that this kind of optimization is fairly low impact. I think the main advantage is perhaps the robustness against packet drops is better.
105.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Hmm, bisect is definitely not one of those.
106.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Not only, you also must be able to delete user data. If you have anything that could be considered PII (including IP addresses) you're responsible for potentially needing to delete that. It completely makes certain engineering patterns
107.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
I'm curious what the implications are if I host a free web-app that EU users might end up using. As far as I understand, you're still subject to GDPR even if you're not making money off it. Seems like to me there's massi
108.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
I don't have a strong love for python, but all the tooling the author mentioned has actually made python fairly decent to use now. Still could be better, but I think Python's really hit its stride now.
109.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Sounds similar to IPFS.
110.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
> it is intuitive after someone explains it to me, but not intuitive much before the explanation Isn't that pretty close to what something being intuitive means? Ie. something being intuitive means that it's easily understood o
111.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Curious what you see as outpacing polars, hybrid analytical/streaming query engines?
112.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
uv and ruff are a great counterexample to all those people who say "never reinvent the wheel". Don't ever do it just for the sake of doing it, but if you have focused goals you can sometimes produce a product that's an o
113.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
I personally really like marimo. It's very easy to use and for data analysis type tasks it seems to work a lot better than jupyter in most cases.
114.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
I guess the question is is wealth inequality/income inequality something to be targeted? Also, there's the question of whether the living standards of the poorest improve faster if we target wealth/income inequality?
115.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
He said LLVM, not LLM. Maybe it's the same reason as Go, to be able to guarantee that codegen runs really fast.
116.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
> When I code. I never write a single unit test. Just types, and integration or end 2 end tests. It doesn't hurt to write a unit test and it's actually better. But the fact that I'm confident my code works without it shows
117.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
In general though, a strong statically typed language will allow the user to locally reason to a much greater extent.
118.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Ironically the strongest advocates of dynamic languages tend to be places where a strong type system would solve a huge percentage of their bugs. Web development is mostly the munging of data together and ensuring that you're glueing s
119.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
> Code can type check but not be correct. Depends on your type system. It can prove the correctness of certain properties depending on your language. Conversely, unit tests can pass but your code might not be correct.
120.
▲
by
theLiminator
1y ago
Anyone use xarray? Curious how it compares?
More ›