theGnuMe

54 ms·

901.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
There is an argument that US defense spending also pays to protect Europe. So maybe the EU should pay for US healthcare.
902.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
That sounds like a lot of work...
903.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Yeah I was going to say it works great until it doesn't which I find is a lot of time as in more than 2x per day. I get throttled and it is basically nonfunctional. That and dropped calls.
904.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Imagine AI grading.. you can't pass till you meet its filter. Want to write something WOKE.. nope.
905.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Interesting it does so poorly on AP English and reading and composition.
906.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
There is another view that inflation was transitory and driven by corporate profiteering vs wages.
907.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
That is certainly coming soon.
908.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
These guys will get themselves killed or worse kill someone. Here's hoping the Mexican Army arrests them before that happens.
909.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
I thought we were talking about companies that you choose to work for?
910.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
It'd be way worse without the Fed, we'd have a collapse of everything...
911.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
I mean it's like printed everywhere that deposits over $250k may lose value... how do you reconcile that?
912.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
I think money is psychological too. I still think $20 is a lot of money but some people think $50 is the new $20.
913.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
I don't think it is that complicated. I am surprised at the high balances in SVB though from companies that should've known better.
914.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Here here.
915.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
This is why Thiel was first, he can stick to his ideological guns. He also forced Silicon Valley valley to setup the massive bluff that they were too big to fail (and maybe they are indeed to big to fail) that the government refused to cal
916.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
FDIC insures accounts to $250k. Why would any sane and rational person put more than $250k in any one account?
917.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
> We can't generally expect workers to evaluate the financial soundness of their employers. Why not? It’s like fundamental…
918.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
ummm.. they chose their employer?
919.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
unplug the phones and pull the internet... seems simple enough.
920.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
That's how it actually works. The FDIC administers the asset sale.
921.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Yes it sucks but rules are rules. Existential risk management.
922.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
My speech gets rate limited under the guise of "posting too fast" here from time to time. For YC that and flagging are a feature being used to control the narrative and as a user it sucks because you can't in general have a c
923.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Yeah that is not what it means. I'm sorry to inform you of that.
924.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Hey man, they own the place so it is their rules. Do you think the speech is free here? Newspeak only.
925.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
No we have not established a moral hazard. It's always been $250k. You are trying to make one up implying that we are "suddenly altering expectations". The narrative has always been, FDIC insured accounts are insured up t
926.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Lol.. "hey bail us out or we will shut Hacker News down".
927.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Your funds are insured up to $250k. That's the expectation and reality. Every account has the disclaimer that amounts in excess of $250k are not insured.
928.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Evangelical Jesus is the Profit.
929.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
Can anyone ELI5 this? I don't get it.
930.
by theGnuMe 4y ago
It is in the sense that it is Markov chain with an 8k token memory and the "MCMC step" is the DNN.

More ›