theCrowing

40 ms·

361.
by theCrowing 4y ago
Snakeoil salesmen were hugely successful.
362.
by theCrowing 4y ago
Are you peter gregory?
363.
by theCrowing 4y ago
narcissm.
364.
by theCrowing 4y ago
It might be but it’s still the law?
365.
by theCrowing 4y ago
Because otherwise a business would be violating a law if they serve European customers?
366.
by theCrowing 4y ago
I don't get it everyone and their VCs is forcing you to build native apps because they can extract more data than from an PWA or website. They could allow every rendering engine and they would still force you to install the app. The on
367.
by theCrowing 4y ago
Has nothing to do with big tech or not. The video got report spammed.
368.
by theCrowing 4y ago
In Europe the terms are reversed a joint is mixed with tobacco and a spliff is pure. Threw me off when I visited the US for the first time.
369.
by theCrowing 4y ago
Motorsports ≠ illegal public road races
370.
by theCrowing 4y ago
He also stated it as fact in the shortform result (without the 99,9% number) contracdicting his own conclusion in the conclusion section. Sometimes providing information that has a clear correlation with the source material shows you that m
371.
by theCrowing 4y ago
The process of writing scientific papers is mostly the same no matter the subject. The biggest flag was probably that he stated that he is 99,9% sure in interviews but the number never shows in the paper and in the conclusion part he just s
372.
by theCrowing 4y ago
The biggest was probably stating the results as facts in the result section and only as "more likely" in the conclusion. Sample size, taking only part of the genomes. The code quality of their scripts on GitHub and especially the
373.
by theCrowing 4y ago
The biggest was probably stating the results as facts in the result section and only as "more likely" in the conclusion. Sample size, taking only part of the genomes. The code quality of their scripts on GitHub and especially the
374.
by theCrowing 4y ago
I read articles, got more intrested, read the paper, found some procedural mistakes that threw red flags, looked for scientists in the field to see what they think about it and after all that I looked at his social media and got annoyed rea
375.
by theCrowing 4y ago
If you look at the paper objectively even someone without the proper credentials should see red flags popping up left and right. He may have the credentials but his social media activities and his blatant hate for the scientific community (
376.
by theCrowing 4y ago
It's on a new pro kanye west subreddit and I bet it's fake and done for clout or easy karma. I uploaded a rip from youtube (there are hundreds of versions online btw.) and nothing happened... yet. The strange thing is there are no