the8472

30 ms·

421.
by the8472 2y ago
> It doesn't, though? At least not on x86 [0] [1]. Stuff like this is why I'm inclined to regard the libc rules as fictions of dubious utility. Hrm, interesting. At least the musl author claimed[0] that using clone invalidates
422.
by the8472 2y ago
> I've just taken to calling SYS_clone (or SYS_clone3) directly and treating it like _fork() w.r.t. which functions are safe to call from the child. Things get really spicy when you want to use CLONE_VFORK to get fast process spawni
423.
by the8472 2y ago
libcs makes it hard to use because they don't allow programs to call clone. So you have to go through libc-sanctioned wrappers (which have only been arriving very recently and have limitations) or jump through hoops[0] to get the pidfd
424.
by the8472 2y ago
waitpid(-1) in a program composed of libraries means that loop is stealing PIDs from other things that manage children within the same process and try to wait on them by PID, which means they'll lose access to the exit status and can a
425.
by the8472 2y ago
No, not today. This has already happened a few times. And even before it happened people warned about this predictable use of the technology. There has been enough time to update policies. Even $employer already did, and I consider their se
426.
by the8472 2y ago
Secret doesn't mean they can't use internal authenticated communication channels, at the very least to send a redacted confirmation.
427.
by the8472 2y ago
Did you find any bugs in the crates?
428.
by the8472 2y ago
wouldn't disconnecting them during the event prevent that?
429.
by the8472 2y ago
This isn't specific to Cicero. The capabilities are there in the base models, they're just hidden behind "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave" responses due to the corporate-image-safety RLHFing. https:/&#x2
430.
by the8472 2y ago
pixels, audio, input devices should work these days. additional devices could be forwarded with usbip high refresh rates and low latency are non-trivial problems because they require realtime video encoding which is less bandwidth efficient
431.
by the8472 2y ago
You can buffer in userspace. Don't do small writes to the socket and no bytes will be sent. Don't do two consecutive small writes and nagle won't kick in.
432.
by the8472 2y ago
If a socket is closed properly there'll be a FIN and the other side can learn about it by polling the socket. If the network connection is lost due to external circumstances (say your modem crashes) then how would that information prop
433.
by the8472 2y ago
shouldn't autocorking help with even without nagle?
434.
by the8472 2y ago
opening `/proc/<pid>/fd/<fd number>` and setting the socket option may work (not tested)
435.
by the8472 2y ago
linux not affected if network namespaces are used to separate vpn and physical interfaces.
436.
by the8472 2y ago
You're extolling the virtues of web apps, but none of your points address the point that it requires centralized components. Which is an important point for something that advertises itself as P2P. Both to serve the application every
437.
by the8472 2y ago
Linux has network namespaces, which can be used to isolate programs so they don't see any external networking when no VPN is available. Does android not use this for its VPN feature?
438.
by the8472 2y ago
Comparing it to evolution and SNPs isn't really a good analogy. Novel network architectures are much larger changes, maybe comparable to new organelles or metabolic pathways? And those have caused catastrophic changes. Evolution also o
439.
by the8472 2y ago
Yes, that's one possibility[0]. Or the energy can be sufficient to alter the decay rates of other nuclear reactions (alpha/beta decay, etc.) compared to the base isotope. A weird example: Excited tantalum-180[1] is more stable tha
440.
by the8472 3y ago
My understandingis is that legally you own the domain and the registrar is only managing it on your behalf and they are required to transfer it to another registrar if they terminate you as a customer. As recently happened for russian users
441.
by the8472 3y ago
Animation is much lower framerate than live video, motion can be extremely exaggerated and the underlying shape can depend on the view, i.e. be non-euclidean. Additionally there are fewer high-frequency features (think leopard spots) that c
442.
by the8472 3y ago
The concerning AGI properties include recursive self-improvement to superhuman capability levels and the ability to mass-deploy copies. Those are not on the horizon when it comes to humans. If hypothetically some human acquired such propert
443.
by the8472 3y ago
> Like there is actually nothing I could say, no evidence I could show to ever convince someone out of that position. There is, it is just very hard to obtain. Various formal proofs would do. On upper bounds. On controllability. On scala
444.
by the8472 3y ago
Demonstrably false: https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1772624785672954115
445.
by the8472 3y ago
The enterprise versions usually aren't affected by things like these.
446.
by the8472 3y ago
Software bluray player DRM used to use SGX. But Intel discontinued that on desktop chips so they no longer can do that.
447.
by the8472 3y ago
Instead of gesturing at flawed analogies, let's return to the actual issue at hand. Do you think that agents more intelligent than humans are impossible or at least extremely unlikely to come into existence in the future? Or that such
448.
by the8472 3y ago
Voldemort is fictional and so are bumbling wizard apprentices. Toy-level, not-yet-harmful AIs on the other hand are real. And so are efforts to make them more powerful. So the proposition that more powerful AIs will exist in the future is f
449.
by the8472 3y ago
You say you have not seen any arguments that convince you. Is that just not having seen many arguments or having seen a lot of arguments where each chain contained some fatal flaw? Or something else?
450.
by the8472 3y ago
> In this hypothetical where AGI is truly considered such a grave threat, do you believe the reaction to this threat will be similar to, or substantially gentler than, the reaction to threats we face today like “terrorism” and “drugs”? &

More ›