th0ma5

16 ms·

211.
by th0ma5 1y ago
The demos I see all make compromises in order to work that hobble you from hardening them or otherwise lock you to very specific conceptualizations that you simply wouldn't have building from the smallest low level building blocks or e
212.
by th0ma5 1y ago
I see all of this as a constant negotiation of what is and isn't needed out of traditional computing. Eventually they find that what they want from any of it is determinism, unfortunately for LLMs.
213.
by th0ma5 1y ago
It's very appealing as a kind of irreducible complexity. It feels close to what is actually happening and is simple hahah if like you say not optimized.
214.
by th0ma5 1y ago
No, I've played with all the reasoning models and they just make the noise and weirdness even worse. When I dig into every little issue, it's always something incredibly bespoke. Like the actual documentation that's on the in
215.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Do you find yourself ditching on the things when they change something important with the new prompt? I don't get how people aren't absolutely exhausted by actually implementing this prompt messing advice when I thought there were
216.
by th0ma5 1y ago
I mean, you're not even wrong ! Most all of these large models are based on the idea that if you put all of the representations that we can of the world into a big pile that you can tease out some kind of meaning. There's not even
217.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Has a point of view, a clear motive, ability to think holistically about things that are hard to digitize, get mad and clean up a bunch of stuff absolutely correctly because they're finally just "sick of all of this shit", or
218.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Have you ever tried to get those little bits of styrofoam completely off of a cardboard box? Have you ever seen something off in the distance and misjudged either what it was or how long it would take to get there?
219.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Kinda wild how no comments here suggest that this person's disingenuous nature has made many believe that this is made up. It will be discouraging to find out.
220.
by th0ma5 1y ago
You're making me wonder if Signal is the customer of the third party and not the government.
221.
by th0ma5 1y ago
That's the ultimate goal of these models, though, to exhaust you of any sass. They will eventually approach full hallucination I'd imagine for any eventually long enough context.
222.
by th0ma5 1y ago
No, not at all. Why do people keep saying shit like these thought terminating sentences. Try to see the glass of Kool Aid please. People are trying to understand how to communicate important valuable things about failure states and you&#x27
223.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Oh !!
224.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Oh I thought this was going to be about the cult like in group signaling of LLM advocates, but this is a thing imagining language patterns as a society instead of language patterns of a society being a bias that the models have.
225.
by th0ma5 1y ago
No have you personally worked with anyone else or a large group or maintaining these things?
226.
by th0ma5 1y ago
What does this even mean? Lol.
227.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Except here the core functionality changes day to day and hinges on specific word usage.
228.
by th0ma5 1y ago
So glad we're pinning the success and learning of new technology on random anecdotes. Do pro AI people not see how untenable it is where everything is a rumor?
229.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Kinda wild to read a post on here so true it stops you in your tracks. People are missing a lot of opportunities.
230.
by th0ma5 1y ago
This seems huge? I know turning into a production process is a whole other issue, but this seems big?
231.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Reminds me the "crypto" name overloading. It is clear that fanboys are jealous of competence.
232.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Still making demos huh? Have you ever observed anyone else using your techniques and the kinds of problems that they may be having?
233.
by th0ma5 1y ago
I subscribe to Microcenter's emails and the one with the miscellaneous lesser priced accessories always completely loads in Gmail and it gives me a little bit of that feeling of flipping through an old computer shopper. I think those a
234.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Except the skill involved is believing in random people's advice that a different model will surely be better with no fundamental reason or justification as to why. The benchmarks are not applicable when trying to apply the models to n
235.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Whate besides anecdote makes you think a different model will be anything but marginally incrementally better?
236.
by th0ma5 1y ago
I wish I could upvote you more. The compounding errors of these document solutions preclude what people assume must be possible.
237.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Well as always the belief is immutable, the evidence can only serve that belief and so if it doesn't it surely isn't evidence in that confused perspective.
238.
by th0ma5 1y ago
People probably don't discuss the problems enough about an open world knowledge graph. Essentially the same class of problems as spam filters. Using an open language model to produce a graph doesn't create a closed world graph by
239.
by th0ma5 1y ago
Or California could trailblaze proper regulation! Thanks for posting about the efforts! I'm going to see if I can support them in any way.
240.
by th0ma5 1y ago
No they probably meant existing companies... when are AI companies going to get rid of their CEOs?

More ›