text0404

8 ms·

121.
by text0404 8mo ago
The point is that you fight against injustice even in the face of state violence. Every movement that is a threat to existing power structures faces violence. Take a look at the labor movement in the US, the civil rights movement in the US,
122.
by text0404 8mo ago
Truly ridiculous. I briefly wondered if you actually believe this rhetoric, but then I saw your three-day-old account. Not going to debate with someone who doesn't have the courage to stand behind their convictions. Your account is a t
123.
by text0404 8mo ago
Exactly. Comply with the armed men and you won't die. Compliance is required for a healthy society. Just comply and you won't be hurt. Compliance is required for a functioning society. Comply and purge society of undesirables. Eve
124.
by text0404 8mo ago
... and we should improve those conditions for both men and women so that they can live fulfilling lives. Your whole argument is predicated on the "redpilled" idea that gender rights are zero-sum, and that's just not the case
125.
by text0404 8mo ago
They said "concrete evidence". Have we also considered that US consumers seek out brainrot, so the algorithm gives them what they want? How is that different from any other US-owned social media?
126.
by text0404 9mo ago
You're the only person speculating about their motives. Everyone else is watching the same incident, shot from multiple cameras/angles, which make it clear that an extreme escalation of violence from untrained ICE agents towards a
127.
by text0404 9mo ago
You can quite clearly see the second shooter in the video standing over him, shooting him multiple times as he's laying motionless on the ground after being beaten and shot once. > the most likely theory According to whom? What&#x27
128.
by text0404 9mo ago
It's probably the fact that you created two accounts in 30 mins to astroturf/troll a thread about climate change which is an actual, measurable phenomenon. https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=hasanabi Edit: this
129.
by text0404 9mo ago
> ICE is most definitely federal law enforcement Cool, how do I identify them? They don't have badges and refuse to give ID. They cover their faces and use excessive force. Should I just immediately give up my rights and do whatever
130.
by text0404 9mo ago
You could just read the article before knee-jerking to state repression. > November 13, 2025 — Initial disclosure sent to Flock Safety security team > November 14, 2025 — First follow-up requesting confirmation of receipt > Novembe
131.
by text0404 9mo ago
Interesting that this user "EthanAsher"'s account was created 3 months / 90 days ago with a single submission and no comments. Another account which recently posted more material [1] from this Saudi-funded mouthpiece (ir
132.
by text0404 9mo ago
> “put X into a bikini” is constitutionally protected speech Unfortunately if "put X into a bikini" is a command to an AI to generate CSAM of an underage child, that's no longer "constitutionally protected" terri
133.
by text0404 9mo ago
Because Mamdani is not "far far left" unless you live in the American echo chamber which treats anything not right-wing as a leftist threat [1]. On a global stage, where actual political systems exist beyond America's basic,
134.
by text0404 9mo ago
None of these excuses are sufficient for allowing a product which you created to be used to generate CSAM on a platform you control. Pornography is regulated. CSAM is illegal. Hosting it on your platform and refusing to remove it is compli
135.
by text0404 9mo ago
The taxpayers paid $2-3T in Iraq. The military-industrial complex made a killing.
136.
by text0404 9mo ago
You think the business executives in this administration managed to organize the kidnapping of a head of state? Trump pointed at it and a massive machinery which was built over hundreds of years made it happen. People who have been doing th
137.
by text0404 9mo ago
Yes, tool calling.
138.
by text0404 9mo ago
Why are there "good ol boys" tasks in the first place? Instead, automate the C-suite with AI, get rid of these backroom dealings and exclusive private networks, and participate in a purer free market based on data. Isn't this
139.
by text0404 10mo ago
That is absolutely not what the Snowden docs showed. Would highly recommend familiarizing yourself at least a little bit with a major part of history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_global_surveillance_disc... &gt
140.
by text0404 10mo ago
What are you talking about? This is weaponization of the FBI to treat US citizens like criminals by designating them as terrorists or supporters of terrorism. This is not a "both sides" issue. This is the full weight of the state
141.
by text0404 10mo ago
> Back during Obama's tenure lots of right sympathetic groups got labeled domestic terror organizations Which groups were labeled domestic terror organizations by the Obama admin? SPLC is a non-profit, not a government agency.
142.
by text0404 11mo ago
lol you're delusional. > I can’t help you i'm ok with that, i'll still be fine. you should get an education tho if you're gonna try to have big boy conversations on the internet.
143.
by text0404 11mo ago
You're so deep in your own racist caricature of the world that you don't even know what's real anymore. Read a book, dude.
144.
by text0404 11mo ago
Yeah, didn't you know we're in free fall because of checks notes the influx of Muslim Communists? If only New York had learned this one important lesson then they too wouldn't fall as far as checks notes again the state w
145.
by text0404 1y ago
Oh, so an "emotional appeal"? That's also a logical fallacy btw. This is about your personal fears of a candidate's religion and not his actions. Otherwise (if this were actually about your fear of indoctrination and dog
146.
by text0404 1y ago
Uh no it isn't - you literally said > We need to have an honest discussion for those arguing in favor of this faith about their positions on these very discriminatory segments of their core texts and then ignored that most politici
147.
by text0404 1y ago
Are you really claiming that Christianity and Judiasm have no problematic passages about slavery, women, and war? Where is your handwringing about all the Christian politicians - shouldn't there be a UN resolution denouncing the proble
148.
by text0404 1y ago
Sure. Crappy headline. I was going to post the NYT one ("Democratic Report Says Disorder at DOGE Jeopardized Americans’ Data: Members of a Senate panel described a haphazard working and living environment that involved transferring sen
149.
by text0404 1y ago
The headline of a news article is a way to draw the reader in. The subhead in this case was "A report from Senate Democrats says DOGE moved sensitive information to a cloud server despite the risk of 'catastrophic' impacts,&q
150.
by text0404 1y ago
> As outlined in the report, DOGE staffers moved a live copy of Americans’ personal information to a cloud server despite an internal risk assessment from the Social Security Administration (SSA), which determined the impact could be “ca

More ›