Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tertius
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
151.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
My test says I have dead nucleotides from the RNA of this virus. Do I need to pay up or am I clear? Maybe getting the courts involved is not such a bad idea.
152.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Cue: I'm not comfortable giving that type of power to the elected officials. Their power should be limited. Cloth masks aren't effective yet we're all pretendying, even the experts (who were all laughing at the plebs who were
153.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Before we get to the answer we need to realize that a slippery slope is often presented to make the opposition realize that they're being irrational or missing something. Once this realization has been made it is often also unnecessary
154.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
> Not only is that impossible to know, what if you infected some people who were immnuno-compromised. Firstly, yes drunk driving is far more dangerous to the public per incident than a Covid infectious positive case. This is glaringly ob
155.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Agreed. But if you're walking without a mask you are MUCH less likely to kill someone...
156.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
> It's better. No, you misunderstand. Making a claim that the data shows your conclusion to be true is what is not scientific. I.e. your statement is not based on any scientific evidence whether you think it is or not. It's jus
157.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
I'd you hit someone with a car, they will likely die. If you expose someone to corona on purpose (i.e. you're so drunk you can't avoid people) they likely won't die. It's not Ebola. And the analogy doesn't fit.
158.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Who decides when a mask is needed/not needed? Should we always be forced to wear masks going forward given that we've been made aware of the efficacy? Why stop at Corona? Flu is next. Then "we" (or whoever chose masks) l
159.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
I don't think you're following. You have probably drawn this line in similar areas in life yourself but were probably not thoughtful about it because the media wasn't shaming you into it.
160.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
> I feel like I know the difference between band of fringe persons with Doctor in their name who have a controversial underdog belief and the official scientific sources for information. Possibly true if you yourself had credentials. If
161.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Any of these studies include your metrics of interest? I.e. BMI, blood pressure etc.?
162.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Depends on how well you absorb it personally. For instance, if you're deficient, you need more. If you're older you need more. If you have a darker skin color you need more. It's fairly hard to get toxicity (still to be avoid
163.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Net worth disparity between richest and average is irrelevant. It doesn't change anything. Everyone is better off and there are some that are, because of the system that made it better for everyone one, much better off. Just a symptom
164.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
People are better off partly because of the 1%. The system that allows some too gain in excess also allows all to flourish.
165.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
I freely give up my coins for comfort and use my time with my family. If someone else chooses otherwise and earns more money than me, honestly. I can't complain about the difference in our individual net. Freedom is better than control
166.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Easy. They can: - work their way up the ladder in their current job. (If not possible, look for another job where it is.) - find a job with upward mobility that doesn't take much training and is quick to start. Welding, plumbing etc.
167.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
If it's getting better for all then why does it matter? Serious question.
168.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
> And it hasn't - we're back to worse than we were during the gilded age. Poverty levels tells a different story.
169.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
All of this is available and not expensive. Easy? Maybe not. You don't want to do it? That's your choice.
170.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Just grabbed one of these too. Great middle ground between F-91W and the g-shocks.
171.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
How many car miles per large truck mile is driven?
172.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Don't knock it till you try it... I'm sure you have some efficiency built into your life that makes you more fragile. (I don't use vim/emacs etc.) But you're saying that running water is a not a good idea because wh
173.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
"That's like saying this other situation that we can look back at by analogy and overlay it on the future that hasn't yet played out." Nope.
174.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
If also connected to the db for all fiction ebooks on Amazon.
175.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Please share your thoughts as well as the verse you think supports it. I don't see it just from reading this verse (and knowing the section).
176.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
To be fair, more like "Harry Potter Copier Word".
177.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Again, the goal, even with the english words changed in your paraphrase was not about appearing/embracing as a different sex/gender. It was in abstaining from sexual activity through castration or choice.
178.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Paul was a Jew. He was only ever relating in the NT what the Old testament was teaching. So it's very easy to understand what he was saying if you reference what he was quoting. On sexuality being innate/not a choice. The Bible do
179.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Not quite. Their goal re: castration was not to become female or identify as such.
180.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
It's probably much easier, politically, to pay for everyone than to work on pricing.
More ›