Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tertius
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
91.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
It is particularly true. And too many armchair academics are painting HCQ in a bad light when it is an immensely important and safe drug. > Medicine also isn't in the "we recommend it because there aren't many reasons agai
92.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
I see. Sorry I didn't complete the idea when "owning wealth" was used. I own money in a bank account. But I see now what he/she meant.
93.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
How so?
94.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
His reason for recommending not wearing masks was "to save PPE capacity for frontline medical workers". Not any of reasons he gave at the time. This is a definition of ulterior motive. I'm not making a judgement whether he wa
95.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
https://www.thestreet.com/video/dr-fauci-masks-changing-dire... Discussion: https://youtu.be/_2MmX2U2V3c He did lie. He gave advice with ulterior motives.
96.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
PCR positive doesn't mean infected. You'll need an high amount in PCR, i.e. low cycle threshold for the probability to be high. Antigen tests will show if there was/is an infection. PCR does not show infection only presence.
97.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Nope, but for masks, overwhelming evidence exists prior to 2020. Just because you don't understand how this virus spreads does not mean that we need a new trial before we can make a recommendation.
98.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
HCQ is a very safe medicine.
99.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Masks and the way this virus spreads isn't new. New medicines, requiring trials are novel. Golden eggs and apples shouldn't be compared. What new data has finally come in that has shown that masks do not slow the spread or that th
100.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Here: https://www.thestreet.com/video/dr-fauci-masks-changing-dire...
101.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
No, scarfs don't work.
102.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Yes, except Fauci was against masks because of fake science, I mean because of supply. I.e He lied. (And has admitted it was because of supply). https://www.thestreet.com/video/dr-fauci-masks-changing-dire... And most
103.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
PPE was recommended for people dealing with Covid positive. Fauci lied (and admitted to it) that masks weren't effective and suggested that the average person should not wear them. To be fair, I heard the whole medical community here (
104.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
We have immense testing capacity in the U.S. where's the lack?
105.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
The CDC is not the man on the street. The man on the street can distrust an institution that suggests something unscientific when they are requesting trust from the public. Doesn't matter if said man on the street thinks the earth is f
106.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
I am appalled that he lied and owned up to it later. But from his perspective (and it may have been not just his choice) what were the alternatives if his goal was to preserve frontline medical workers? (Regardless if this policy actually s
107.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
As a kid I couldn't see the political motivations and BS the media was peddling. Rose-tinted corneas slowly fading over time the more I could argue and see nuance.
108.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
If they haven't been proven to be infected why should it matter?
109.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
I think this depends on the field. If you're working 5+ years at a postdoc earning no money that time would have probably been better spent in industry.
110.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
This hurts buyers not sellers.
111.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
And I agree with you that it's the right thing to do. But saying it will work better is probably not true. Except maybe if you include a line like: "were not going to ask you for a 5 star review like others do, but reviews really
112.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
You're responding to someone that agrees with you. But also states that everyone else is review-farming and that if they don't do it they will be left behind. I.e. your plan is doomed to fail.
113.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Mandated?
114.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
You can go anywhere safely. You can also go anywhere recklessly, or what reckless people call "having some fun". Does that clear up your misunderstanding?
115.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
I can't stop everyone else from driving drunk but I sure can exhibit self control and not speed or drive dangerously as to endanger others just because I want to have some fun. Just because you're not a drunk doesn't mean you
116.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
You're taking negative actions by some and applying it to a class. I'm simply stating that they are negative actions by some. If that didn't come across, here it is.
117.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
> Humans aren’t that different. This is true, except when it's not. Then it really matters. I do agree some in this thread are exaggerating a little.
118.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
The monolith? Or the few who had people with lapses in judgement? Are you saying corporate structure in the law causes these actions?
119.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Yes, with a specifically chosen image.
120.
▲
by
tertius
6y ago
Ah, so those who responded to you were correct in their assessment? Be honest about it before you start asking questions to trap the person you're asking. It goes a long way.
More ›