teravor

4 ms·

31.
by teravor 1mo ago
it has been amusing watching you try to pretend that you knew what survivorship bias was. first you assumed it had something to do with death. then you invoked the plane anecdote. now you link the wikipedia without realizing that over 90% o
32.
by teravor 1mo ago
survivorship bias is a statistical error, why would you invoke planes? especially after saying this: Huh? Survival of what? Are you claiming that Democrat fraud was not found only because the perpetrators are all dead? also, you a
33.
by teravor 1mo ago
> because what you describe is not survivorship bias then you should look up what survivorship bias is. the visible group in this scenario are the individuals who were caught. which says nothing about any conspiracies or even o
34.
by teravor 1mo ago
he is implying that the focus on the republican cases (the survivors) is a red herring because the system is presumably such that an actual conspiracy cannot be detected. I don't know anything about elections, a question worth asking i
35.
by teravor 2mo ago
such decentralized systems would have to rely on a DHT and the domains would be public keys, somewhat defeating the purpose of a domain. an effort to do this: https://github.com/pubky/pkarr
36.
by teravor 2mo ago
that means all you had to do was gate the content behind a javascript snippet with a timer.
37.
by teravor 2mo ago
anubis was a joke on arrival. PoW for this purpose is plain stupid. the only feasible CAPTCHA at this moment is probably hCaptcha. they began to offer animated challenges. it's probably the best you can do, using an LLM to solve them w
38.
by teravor 2mo ago
there is currently no linux distribution where it's safe to run an application as is. they tend to have access to /home which is game over. some people who actually care about security will create bubblewrap/bwrap profiles fo
39.
by teravor 2mo ago
and those measures have always been merely annoyances. except for the VM methods which impact performance significantly. now none of those methods matter as you can just instruct an LLM to bang its head against the wall until the wall break
40.
by teravor 2mo ago
you can diff binaries in a disassembler, the technique has been used for a long time to discover patched Microsoft vulnerabilities, create exploits and then race the world. now you can instruct an LLM to do this with MCP...
41.
by teravor 2mo ago
you might as well call consciousness a soul at this point. something I once wondered about is what a soul can be and what implications it would have. the conclusions I drew is that the entire concept was incoherent. if a soul is so intrinsi
42.
by teravor 2mo ago
in the limit the honeypots would be dynamic and some of them secret, so at the very least a rogue agent would have a significant chance of stepping on a landmine. this game doesn't favor the agents, the honeypot could be as simple as a
43.
by teravor 2mo ago
perhaps a solution would be to honeypot the sandbox. if anything touches the honey you kill the agent. also the conclusion to use firecracker or gvisor is obvious, that's what they were made for. it's bizarre to try and escape QEM
44.
by teravor 2mo ago
2 and 3 are virtually on top of each other. they both use KVM too. technically 2 exposes a slightly broader attack surface due to the tighter integration model. you can think of 2 as what would happen if you take 3 and modify it to share r
45.
by teravor 2mo ago
most likely the enormous control surfaces their biology acquired required distributed neuronal mass and once that mass existed further intelligence became advantageous because it was a minor change at that point (switches during embryology
46.
by teravor 2mo ago
is there a case for a long lived animal being a cannibal? I would imagine that prion risk will select for aversion.
47.
by teravor 2mo ago
you would have to be especially incompetent to give a compromise opportunity to streamed tokens, the CVE he listed proves the point. whoever is responsible for that has no business coding anything. > offers easy access to the LLM’s
48.
by teravor 2mo ago
there is nothing magically good about economic activity, it has merely been necessary thus far. once it's no longer necessary and once they can have robot security they will decouple from the rest of society. they would also require mi
49.
by teravor 2mo ago
GLM 5.2 and 5.3 are exceptional at reverse engineering. you just point them at an IDA Pro MCP and off they go doing whatever you want from them.
50.
by teravor 2mo ago
> writing scripts you can use a Gemini model completely for free doing that. no agent. aistudio.google.com
51.
by teravor 2mo ago
these $/task figures aren't very useful in my experience. it doesn't tell you how well it did the task. generally I choose models by their intelligence and then personal preference from direct experience.
52.
by teravor 2mo ago
it depends on what you want to do. in my case I only want disk swap to be used for hibernation. I calibrated the system to make do with the very generous zram compression ratio of 3 and if it doesn't work out a userspace OOM killer wil
53.
by teravor 2mo ago
zram can create a very good buffer for that sort of thing
54.
by teravor 2mo ago
in that scenario you can obtain a nullifier which serves as your identifier but prevents you from generating a new one without another valid passport. the nullifier can then be your cryptographic identity as a member of some group. without
55.
by teravor 2mo ago
a third party can voluntarily surrender complete control over what is going on. they can issue a token for something, for example a $10 dollar bill but do it in such a way (blind signature) that when you go to spend it they cannot connect t
56.
by teravor 2mo ago
when you distill a thinking LLM past its capacity it will default to overthinking because during training that was the only way for a chance at a reward on many tasks. you can generally avoid this if you specialize it on a domain that is wi
57.
by teravor 2mo ago
basically he is feeding the same input to multiple models, taking their outputs and dumping it into an LLM to sort out what the actual transcription probably is. expensive but effective.
58.
by teravor 2mo ago
there is a dead comment below yours, these new accounts (weird?) seem convinced that a prover needs to be trusted. but if you trust the prover why would you need a proof? nevermind the fact that they are entirely mistaken it doesn't ev
59.
by teravor 2mo ago
> switching costs what are they? all you have to do is change a URL and a token in your agent harness.
60.
by teravor 2mo ago
> relies on you trusting the client to send you true information about data this is false. the client is constrained to send you true information or else the verifiers will know to reject it. ZKP's are not magic, you need

More ›