teodorlu

7 ms·

31.
by teodorlu 4y ago
I get the impression that the author criticizes bad planning, or estimation. To me, a good plan is a map of dependencies in time.
32.
by teodorlu 4y ago
I think entr handles some things more cleanly, though: 1. Some bash is allowed, which has been confusing me. I'd rather call 'bash -c "echo stuff > file"' myself. 2. Watchexec has its own interface for "filt
33.
by teodorlu 4y ago
I love `entr`, but I've recently moved a lot of my `entr` usage to `watchexec`. Entr requires a file list on stdin, watchexec watches the current folder. With entr: find . | entr COMMAND with watchexec: watchexec COMMAND
34.
by teodorlu 4y ago
Indeed! How will your customer use your product to solve their problem? What hypotheses do you have? How are you going to test those hypotheses? What is the link from "solving this problem is important to me" to "solving this
35.
by teodorlu 4y ago
Civil engineer / software engineer -> startup CEO here. As others, I would nudge you towards testing the waters yourself first. Then hire people who complement you well. Then consider where you want to go from there. It's risky
36.
by teodorlu 4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beginning_of_Infinity A book that's really changing how I'm thinking. It starts by explaining how science makes progress. Defining a good theory as one that has explanatory p
37.
by teodorlu 4y ago
Try to broaden your audience from yourself, to you and 1-3 people who would be really interested in what you're doing. Are you able to explain what it is? Why it's necessary? Are you able to spike any interest? Creating isn&#x27
38.
by teodorlu 5y ago
I would love to see how that pie chart changes over time.
39.
by teodorlu 5y ago
Problem 1: what are problem are people willing to pay me to solve for them? Problem 2: can that problem be solved with a product? Problem 3: can that product be built? Reading up on product management has helped me a lot here. Empowered (Ma
40.
by teodorlu 5y ago
Agreed - this is a subjective value judgment, hard / impossible to automate. As a list of links to check out, sure. As an automated conclusion? No thanks. Someone is going to have to make a judgment call. If curation isn't built i
41.
by teodorlu 5y ago
I use note taking to think. With a good process and sharp tools, writing let's me solve harder problems, better. And I do want to think better. Currently really happy with Slack, Org-mode and Roam Research, each for its own use.
42.
by teodorlu 5y ago
I'd prefer this to be solved in culture, not in code. New isn't always better; we need a better proxy for value than "amount of new stuff".
43.
by teodorlu 5y ago
I love literal programming. But I don't like the idea that the prose you read is out-of-order relative to the code you write. I prefer a modern language that reads well in-order, that you can read as an outline. That way, you can use t
44.
by teodorlu 5y ago
The aircraft seems to be a Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit. > The Northrop (later Northrop Grumman) B-2 Spirit, also known as the Stealth Bomber, is an American heavy strategic bomber, featuring low observable stealth technology designed for
45.
by teodorlu 5y ago
Happens to me too =/ Firefox on Android.
46.
by teodorlu 5y ago
Have you used CRDTs to solve any practical problems? If so, how does the CRDT solution compare to a non-CRDT solution? If a non-CRDT solution is feasible at all?
47.
by teodorlu 5y ago
Thank you.
48.
by teodorlu 5y ago
I'm enjoying the aesthetic. Thank you!
49.
by teodorlu 5y ago
1. Slack 2. Miro 3. Roam Research Each has advantages and disadvantages used as knowledge systems. Slack is directly accessible for the whole team. You can create #thunderbong-stream, and under a thread link directly to message sources. Tha
50.
by teodorlu 6y ago
I prefer using tools like Linux, Emacs and the terminal because those tools are not prescriptive . Instead, they are flexible. I can mold them to my needs. That flexibility brings a cost of learning, which I'm willing to spend. On the
51.
by teodorlu 6y ago
I found the title to be phrased very weakly compared to the abstract. > We study gender and race in high-impact entrepreneurship using a tightly controlled randomized field experiment. We sent out 80,000 pitch emails introducing promisin
52.
by teodorlu 6y ago
If this essay resonates with you, consider looking into plainenglish.co.uk. Here's a place to start: http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/punctuating-sentences.html
53.
by teodorlu 6y ago
I also switched from Spacemacs to DOOM. I've decided to stay. Reasons: - DOOM Emacs is fast. Fast to start `emacs --daemon`, fast UX with the default config. - I've experienced DOOM Emacs to be more cohesive than Spacemacs I still
54.
by teodorlu 6y ago
Recordings are often recent.
55.
by teodorlu 6y ago
Interesting that the video uses space alien technology as a name for magic. Just look at that magic, cosmic powder, as it's sprinkled on the teddybear. Is it a coincidence that in Land of Lisp, space aliens help humans, and in SICM
56.
by teodorlu 6y ago
As someone who hasn't written any F#, I'm curious about F#'s advantages over Haskell.
57.
by teodorlu 6y ago
Haven't heard of it before, but this looks super interesting! Thanks for the recommendation. I really like the fact that my whole development workflow could be a text editor and a terminal. I enjoyed developing Elm with TCR[1] a while
58.
by teodorlu 6y ago
I've only dabbled with GHCI. I've used it as a standalone REPL for trying out small things, the same way I'd use a Python or Javascript REPL. I haven't used the REPL /the/ developer interface to the program. In
59.
by teodorlu 6y ago
As someone who tried out GHCJS, then Purescript, then Elm, then Clojurescript: - GHCJS and purescript are powerful, but the learning experience might be steep[1] - Elm is an excellent entrypoint into ML programming in the browser. Solid sto
60.
by teodorlu 6y ago
I really appreciate both Clojure and Haskell. I agree that > nearly all of the claims made about Clojure here can be made about haskell , but I'm not sure about `more strongly´. ## DX with Haskell (and ML friends) I miss in Clojure:

More ›