Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tentacleuno
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
Has that ever been proved? All sources I can find are riddled in ambiguity. It's "one of two scenarios". I suppose we'll never really know for certain.
62.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
Obligatory mention: ImagePipe[0]. It lets you compress pictures and edit them. You can share images to ImagePipe and it automatically shows a dialog to share compressed versions with another app (hence the "Pipe" -- it's a
63.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
Perhaps that's an overly cynical take? It doesn't read like AI slop to me, more like an overview of the video. As someone who finds it hard to get solid answers online anymore, I found this article genuinely informative (though,
64.
▲
An Intentional Mistake: The Anatomy of Google's Wi-Fi Sniffing Debacle
(wired.com)
4 points
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
|
0 comments
65.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
This page doesn't explain what FFglitch does, or how it's different to ffmpeg. For instance, what's Glitch? I'm guessing it's an architecture, but the post doesn't explain what it is or contextualize the term
66.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
Doesn't a message written by an AI carry significantly less weight, though? I'd much rather read someone written by an actual human (this applies to most things, really), and would hold it in much higher regard.
67.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
Non-paywalled: https://archive.is/cBIzm
68.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
Past discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27684807
69.
▲
The Line of Death
(textslashplain.com)
4 points
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
|
0 comments
70.
▲
An origin trial for a new HTML <permission> element (2024)
(developer.chrome.com)
98 points
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
|
92 comments
71.
▲
One Roundtrip per Navigation
(overreacted.io)
2 points
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
|
0 comments
72.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
I personally think most services should have this. Otherwise, if you ever go through your block list, you're left wondering why you blocked who you did. The only other option is to use Notepad to keep track, but who really wants to d
73.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
Isn't anti-lag (the type that invokes combustion in the exhaust, anyway) terrible for turbochargers, long-term?
74.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
I don't miss that either (in fact, I know the ECU can do a much better job), but I do enjoy engaging with the car, and thus drive a manual transmission. I'm fairly confident I can get better efficiency and control as opposed to
75.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
I was thinking of that when I wrote the comment! I've heard of electric turbochargers, but I'm not sure how good they are under real-life conditions. Directly using heat energy from the exhaust (as opposed to introducing electri
76.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
Well, from what I understand, the car I drove did . I believe the motor was hooked up to engine's output shaft in some way, so they could work together to generate torque. The gearing seemed very low for the displacement (even had a
77.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
That's strange, it does seem to work now. When I posted my comment, the link returned a 404 error.
78.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
For what it's worth, that link doesn't seem to work anymore. Here's an article which does show what the warning looks like: https://www.theverge.com/news/667484/apple-eu-ios-app-store-...
79.
▲
by
tentacleuno
1y ago
Haven't we been using electric motors and smaller turbos to get around lag? I drove a 3 cylinder MHEV EcoBoost that seemed to use the electric motor(s?) quite well. It seems like a good idea in theory, though I can understand the neg
80.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
You might be able to use App pinning to stop them leaving the Spotify app...
81.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
Interestingly, Lead is still used in fuel for small aircraft. It's called avgas 100LL (Low Lead). I do worry about the effects of the fuel, given lead's health effects at low exposure levels.
82.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
So why not use Peertube as the distribution medium and just build a UI? Seems like it'd be a lot easier than building an entirely new product.
83.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
> Because they have the ability at any point to push software to your computer that compromises your privacy and security in almost undetectable ways. And short of them having an entirely open-source OS that will always be the case. I do
84.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
Could you explain why you've drawn this conclusion? The API seems OK on the surface.
85.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
> If you can produce your content as classic "prerendered" HTML and use JS only for interactive content, both bots and users will appreciate you. Definitely -- as someone who's spent quite a lot of time in the JavaScript e
86.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
> The reluctancy to introduce new syntax too quickly (looking at you, TC39 and Babel) makes go an almost maintenance free language. Could you provide some examples of this? From knowledge of the pipeline operator proposal[0], moving fas
87.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
> I think you're thinking of the BBC. That's not quite right. You don't need a TV License if you're in possession of a TV. You do, however, require one if you watch TV as it is being broadcast , utilise BBC iPlayer
88.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
Emoji search is one of the reasons why I still use GBoard, to be honest. None of the open-source offerings seem to have it.
89.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
That depends on how many polyfills are served via each script.
90.
▲
by
tentacleuno
2y ago
Why not? The `integrity` attribute accepts more than one value[0]. This would technically be feasible, if my understanding of the service is correct. Hashes could be recorded for each combination of feature -- you could then give those li
More ›