tenderlove

9 ms·

61.
by tenderlove 10y ago
Apparently I can't change the link. I'm sorry! :-(
62.
Proposal of a new concurrency model for Ruby 3 [pdf](atdot.net)
188 points by tenderlove 10y ago|87 comments
63.
Rails 5.0: Action Cable, API mode, and more(weblog.rubyonrails.org)
664 points by tenderlove 10y ago|219 comments
64.
Managing heterogeneous environments with ManageIQ(lwn.net)
49 points by tenderlove 11y ago|7 comments
65.
by tenderlove 11y ago
Oh I've done this too on my TI Launchpad projects. Supposedly there is a way to attach a debugger, but I haven't figured out how to do that yet. I turned the LED on and used longer and shorter "on" times to differentia
66.
by tenderlove 12y ago
Thanks, I really appreciate the kind words! <3<3<3<3
67.
by tenderlove 12y ago
It's not just Npm, RubyGems has essentially the same issue. I think the real lesson is "be careful what you install".
68.
by tenderlove 12y ago
A fun bit of info, you can get access to the method cache data directly from Ruby (in MRI) using `RubyVM.stat`. The variables are not really well named, but here is a test program to demonstrate the behavior: class Foo; end
69.
by tenderlove 12y ago
I'm disappointed there are no samples.
70.
by tenderlove 12y ago
hahahahahahaha! amazing!!! My wife will love this. Thank you for making this!
71.
by tenderlove 12y ago
> And in some cases something meant to be a string is winding up unquoted, and being interpreted as something else on load? In this particular case, a timestamp with "UTC" in it should not be interpreted as a timestamp, and o
72.
by tenderlove 12y ago
> Why did they even try to guess at stuff that's in a string, I can't understand. Because that's what the YAML spec says to do. I will try to write better code. :-(
73.
by tenderlove 12y ago
> The ruby 2.1 behavior of serializing out as a Time but then parsing back in to a String anyway -- seems particularly sketchy, and ripe for roundtrip bugs where the string it gets turned into on parse isn't _quite_ the same one tha
74.
by tenderlove 13y ago
Yes it's true (AFAIK). It's a fork of 2.3, and you can find it here: https://github.com/github/rails
75.
by tenderlove 13y ago
It's possible to do that in AdequateRecord, but I've purposely left the mechanism undocumented because the API is not stable. You can do something like this: statement = undocumented_method_call { |params| Article.where(x
76.
Making ActiveRecord 2x faster(tenderlovemaking.com)
158 points by tenderlove 13y ago|44 comments
77.
by tenderlove 13y ago
We take performance very seriously, but we can't locate and fix every perf regression on our own. If you can give us metrics and repro code, we can work to fix the issues.
78.
by tenderlove 13y ago
I commented on the OP's article, but do this for the pk: create_table(:users, id: :uuid) do |t| t.string 'name' end And to make sure the extension is enabled, (in your migrations) do: enable_extension 'uuid-ossp'
79.
by tenderlove 14y ago
My announcement emails contain the hashes and I sign the emails. If you don't trust the blog, you can verify my signature against the announcement emails: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/...
80.
by tenderlove 14y ago
There's supposed to be 4, but google groups seems to be swallowing my announcement emails. :'( Here is the fourth one: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ruby-security-ann/o0...
81.
by tenderlove 14y ago
> I am confused why threads aren't getting more attention on this topic. I think it's because of the "threads are hard" meme. I think the Ruby community is growing beyond that, but it's not a fast process.
82.
by tenderlove 14y ago
Evented I/O sounds miraculous!
83.
by tenderlove 14y ago
Ya, it's definitely related to the number of files required. There are other factors though, like whether methods are defined via eval vs define_method, string allocations from stuff like database tables / column names.
84.
by tenderlove 14y ago
I'd like to figure out where the memory consumption is. I feel like we could do a better job reducing the cold start memory footprint. I've done some stuff with routes, but I feel there are other wins we could get. The good news is we h
85.
by tenderlove 14y ago
The answer is Pico (because it has instructions at the bottom).
86.
by tenderlove 14y ago
We've hacked in to your hearts. ;-) Django folks I've worked with were extremely smart, helpful, and kind. Likewise I only have great things to say. <3<3<3<3<3<3
87.
by tenderlove 14y ago
What is a "Rails template"?
88.
by tenderlove 14y ago
Ouch. Sorry about that. :-(
89.
by tenderlove 14y ago
Thanks for reporting this issue to us! :-D <3<3<3<3
90.
by tenderlove 14y ago
It depends on the webserver you use, not Heroku. The webserver must implement the hijacking API of Rack. Also, you don't necessarily have to run an HTTP server on Heroku. They'll run whatever you want (as long as you change your procfile)

More ›