tempodox

31 ms·

541.
by tempodox 1y ago
What planet are you from?
542.
by tempodox 1y ago
> TypeScript never promised improving safety What, pray tell, would be the point of putting all that type information in there, and then have it checked (via tsc), if not for the sake of safety? What other use would this have in your op
543.
by tempodox 1y ago
It looks like this works by stripping away the type information, so at best it saves you a transpilation pass and doesn't improve safety.
544.
by tempodox 1y ago
Since they've been instructed to keep all logs, your social credit score might suffer.
545.
by tempodox 1y ago
> LLMs just don't have any intelligence. The believers will go to any lengths of contorted “reasoning” to tell you that this is clearly wrong. Just take this comment thread for one representative of countless examples: https:&#x2F
546.
by tempodox 1y ago
This very comment thread demonstrates how utterly hopeless it is trying to educate the believers. It has developed into a full-blown religion by now.
547.
by tempodox 1y ago
That's quite an accomplishment that studios and distributors have achieved, after piracy was down for a few good years. But greed and the urge for enshittification won't be stopped.
548.
by tempodox 1y ago
It's still called whataboutism.
549.
by tempodox 1y ago
> in 2029 Nope, King of America is a lifetime position.
550.
by tempodox 1y ago
It has become so normal, nobody is even calling it corruption any more. See also: “regulatory capture”.
551.
by tempodox 1y ago
Just one tiny step away from China’s social credit score.
552.
by tempodox 1y ago
It's from Microsoft. They always cook up their own incompatible shit instead of using existing standards.
553.
by tempodox 1y ago
> harm to children through greatly increased access to porn via electronic devices I'm curious what harm that would be. As a teen, I once watched a porn movie with my parents, just out of interest. After I've seen it, I becam
554.
by tempodox 1y ago
Theories: - Those weapons get field-tested in a real-life (or rather, real-death) scenario. Kids always want to play with their newest toys. The weakest of the weak also have no lobby and no(?) way to fight back. - “We kill them all befor
555.
by tempodox 1y ago
I would want such information accessible without having to go hunt for it. You could improve your presentation by interposing fewer clicks between a reader and the thing they want to know.
556.
by tempodox 1y ago
I would be interested and even pay for it, but I am not a joiner. And I don't want Google to know any of my email addresses.
557.
by tempodox 1y ago
It seems to use https://api.deepgram.com (and other web endpoints) and apparently needs an API key, so it's not actually local. Why is it being compared to ollama, which does run fully locally?
558.
by tempodox 1y ago
> the forest the technical crowd is going to miss for the trees. If it were intentional, you could call it successful nerd sniping.
559.
by tempodox 1y ago
> This is a very important point and mostly absent from the conversation. That's because when humans are mentioned at all in the context of coding with “AI”, it's mostly as bad and buggy simulations of those perfect machines.
560.
by tempodox 1y ago
You took the words right out of my mouth. Funny how totalitarian dictatorships are all alike.
561.
Git Interactive Rebase Order Is Wrong (2019)(salferrarello.com)
2 points by tempodox 1y ago|1 comments
562.
by tempodox 1y ago
IOW, they facilitate killing people. Got it.
563.
by tempodox 1y ago
Which is nothing new. It just gets reinforced with ever more outrageous examples every once in a while.
564.
by tempodox 1y ago
> who wants to buy books from someone in Monowi, Nebraska? How would anyone know? Which web sites show postal addresses?
565.
by tempodox 1y ago
> plenty of little tasks that previously would take a junior guy all day to do. But that's also where said junior learns something. If those juniors get replaced by machines and not even get hired any more, who is going to teach th
566.
by tempodox 1y ago
That's what I don't understand about AI coding fans. Instead of using a language that was designed to produce executable code, they insert another translation stage with a much murkier and fuzzier language. So you have to learn
567.
by tempodox 1y ago
Going by your first sentence, you must be working in a very bad environment. How can anyone solve a problem they don't understand?
568.
by tempodox 1y ago
I always answer that with this question: When was the last time that productivity gains translated directly into a quality of life increase for the workers? Never, of course, you just have to do more work in less time and the win materializ
569.
by tempodox 1y ago
The best bird's eye overview of OCaml I've seen yet. As a long-time OCaml user, I find it entirely fair.
570.
by tempodox 1y ago
And, what, LLMs to the rescue?

More ›