tempfile

25 ms·

211.
by tempfile 1y ago
Very good of you to go looking, thank you!
212.
by tempfile 1y ago
But what does that have to do with your comment? "a sure fire way to wind them up and get your collar felt" is more about being hassled by police, not really what power relation you have to the executive branch of the government.
213.
by tempfile 1y ago
But this is not a free speech issue. I don't think there is anywhere this would not be protected speech.
214.
by tempfile 1y ago
It is not hard to understand (which is not to say you have to agree with it). It merely puts a significant weight on the intent and expected outcome of the speech. In the case of screaming "I love bacon" at a Muslim it is obvi
215.
by tempfile 1y ago
Doesn't every win for the common employee encourage companies to be as broad as possible? What would count as a "real win" by your standard?
216.
by tempfile 1y ago
> What period of history is that talking about? I also thought this was suspicious, and I believe now that it is just made up.
217.
by tempfile 1y ago
> Unfortunately over the years there have been cases of people forking the project in the attempt to set up a competing service. And it hurts. I am literally incapable of sympathising with this situation. Seriously, what did you expect t
218.
by tempfile 1y ago
That's interesting, I thought the Linux Foundation just existed to give corporations somewhere to put their money without it actually making an effective difference.
219.
by tempfile 1y ago
I followed the link with an ad-blocker enabled and saw nothing.
220.
by tempfile 1y ago
Case in point, 4chan
221.
by tempfile 1y ago
I am not sure how this proposal deals with the problem of templating. If you have a bunch of documents (say, blog articles) that should have a consistent layout, you are going to want to create a template for them. But then the document you
222.
by tempfile 1y ago
Sounds worth reading. Is this the article you mean? https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd
223.
by tempfile 1y ago
If it's not OFL, it goes in the bin.
224.
by tempfile 1y ago
Consider that even the named phenomenon is sloppy: "recursive self improvement" does not imply "self improvement without bounds". This is the "what if you hit diminishing returns and never get past it" claim. A
225.
by tempfile 1y ago
I honestly am not trying to be rude when I say this, but this is exactly the sort of speculation I find problematic and that I think most people in this thread are complaining about. Being able to tell Claude to have a go has no relation at
226.
by tempfile 1y ago
Why should there be a balance between archiving (a useful social good) and exploitation by a platform of copyrighted material they did not create and do not own?
227.
by tempfile 1y ago
Did your comment always say "most spectra"? I swear it was "a spectra" before. Sorry, I must have misread.
228.
by tempfile 1y ago
This take is very naive and should anticipate the obvious criticism: people did try, very very hard, to create structured information systems. They simply did not work. The sort of systems people tend to build are well-scoped for a particul
229.
by tempfile 1y ago
Programming languages are not on a spectrum. I guess they dislike the syntax of JS and the low-level no-batteries of C.
230.
by tempfile 1y ago
> But no, it’s not fine, because the same person was working for a salary of €0 just a few years ago and likely has nowhere close to €700k of random savings stashed away for paying some taxes. By your own admission, this person earned al
231.
by tempfile 1y ago
> While websites serve both human readers and LLMs, the latter benefit from more concise, expert-level information gathered in a single, accessible location. This honestly made me laugh out loud.
232.
by tempfile 1y ago
> It proposes a new standard for AI-web interaction that moves beyond fragile screen scraping and DOM manipulation towards a robust, secure, and efficient machine-readable layer for the internet. This is nothing like robots.txt, it is mu
233.
by tempfile 1y ago
LLMs are indeed not "someone". They are programs, like web browsers, acting on user instruction. The user is a person. I am only talking about people - I never said that an LLM does anything of its own volition. > The simplest
234.
by tempfile 1y ago
> This is a false analogy. I think you are describing something much more like stable diffusion. This article is about Perplexity, which is much closer to "watch a movie and tell me the plot" than it is like "take these 10
235.
by tempfile 1y ago
> if you 10x a single developer, then 10 developers can do 100x I think he might be drunk
236.
by tempfile 1y ago
> Asking for consent is built into the HTTP protocol. The HTTP protocol does not specify what is right and wrong. The fact a protocol encodes or permits a particular kind of behaviour does not mean that every use of the protocol is ethic
237.
by tempfile 1y ago
> I don't think there is anything wrong with ignoring robots.txt Neither do I, I just thought your reply was disingenuous. > Crawling = recursive fetching I do not find this convincing. I am ok with using the word crawler for rec
238.
by tempfile 1y ago
Ok, that wasn't clear before since you just kept saying how you expressed your consent rather than why your consent should be taken into account. Licensing is much much more limited than you seem to be thinking of it. For instance, you
239.
by tempfile 1y ago
I don't know how to make this any clearer. You - website owner - your consent does not matter . You are publishing information on the internet. I do not think you have a right to decide who is allowed to read it or not, or how they us
240.
by tempfile 1y ago
Of course some people want that. And at the moment they can prevent it. But those methods may stop working. Will it then be alright to do it? Of course not, so why bother mentioning that they are able to prevent it now - just give a justifi

More ›