tempfile

7 ms·

91.
by tempfile 2mo ago
Sorry to say, the first half of this comment is almost gibberish. It became algebra when I introduced an unknown variable and wrote down an equation. I can't see a way to solve the problem without doing that. > If X is Ann's cu
92.
by tempfile 2mo ago
Mary IS 24. So Ann WAS 12. Say that was X years ago. Then Mary WAS 24-X and Ann IS 12+X. So 24-X=12+X, X=6, Ann is 18. I can't see a way to do it without algebra.
93.
by tempfile 2mo ago
> Did you? I don't think so. They say the rules are vibes-based (or just wrong). That means you cannot use the rule to draw conclusions. That does not mean "the opposite of the rule is true" or anything like that. Nor does
94.
by tempfile 2mo ago
Yeah. Uber's a successful company and they raised a J round. Therefore the rule (D means Death) is not real. I'm not sure what you're implying, or if you just misunderstood the original comment?
95.
by tempfile 2mo ago
What do you think the real price is? Subscriptions are heavily subsidised, I don't know anyone who would deny that.
96.
by tempfile 2mo ago
There is "absolutely no way to stop" the thing that requires hundreds of billions of dollars of cash injected every year just to avoid falling over?
97.
by tempfile 2mo ago
Being poor correlates with adverse health outcomes. If you insist (as you do) that those health outcomes are due entirely to culture and willpower, then you are forced to conclude that poor people have low willpower and are less moral. This
98.
by tempfile 2mo ago
Right, but we know that HIV/AIDS essentially is a solved problem in rich countries, that the mentioned interventions are readily available in rich countries, and the only reason HIV transmission is high in poor countries is because,
99.
by tempfile 2mo ago
Very disappointing to see people rush to cynicism, with no effort at all to put blame on Netflix. I get it, you're stupid if you think your employer has your best interests at heart. Why does that mean they get a pass?
100.
by tempfile 2mo ago
This is not whataboutism.
101.
by tempfile 2mo ago
Nobody said they negate each other. The comment being discussed is fearmongering about China and is very relaxed about the USA. All we're saying is you should be either afraid of both or relaxed about both. China is not worse than th
102.
by tempfile 2mo ago
Surely you can just google this.
103.
by tempfile 2mo ago
Sure, why believe anything?
104.
by tempfile 3mo ago
What study do you base your worldview on?
105.
by tempfile 3mo ago
>> although participating developers felt they completed tasks faster using AI, they where around 19% slower > Maybe that was true in 2025, but it's clearly not true any more - I feel so productive now! Even if you are right
106.
by tempfile 3mo ago
Ugh, they're just goodmaxxing.
107.
by tempfile 3mo ago
You absolutely can. How do you know your "working lean proof" actually proves the theorem you intended it to?
108.
by tempfile 3mo ago
Hallucinations are an essential feature of the technology, they cannot be "solved". You may as well hope that we solve the halting problem.
109.
by tempfile 3mo ago
This deduction is baseless, there is no reason to think an LLM will only hallucinate on complex topics. They still get the "number of es in seventeen" question wrong regularly. The kind of mistakes an LLM makes has no clear resemb
110.
by tempfile 3mo ago
Email and phone, or email or phone?
111.
by tempfile 3mo ago
I expected this to go for a long time. It's the only way to anonymously browse 18+ subreddits. I would not be surprised if reddit accounts are effectively (if not always) connectable to a legal identity.
112.
by tempfile 3mo ago
They are unable to be more clear, because the law is unclear. The safe assumption would be "if the code would be copyrightable, had it been written by a human, then it must have been written by a human". It is impossible to be mor
113.
by tempfile 3mo ago
I don't think this is a bad-faith response. Someone might fully retain copyright while using heavy autocomplete. I don't think such a person would be banned by the codeberg policy. This is at least a little bit unintuitive.
114.
by tempfile 3mo ago
If this opens more questions than it answers, then you are simply discovering that you don't understand copyright (which is ok, but not the fault of the Codeberg policy). > You must not share projects that mostly consist [of LLM-gen
115.
by tempfile 3mo ago
Given this is a Jane Street library, I would be surprised if it were not very speed-sensitive already.
116.
by tempfile 3mo ago
> So the whole world needs to pay (spend more) to accommodate to your problem? Yes. > What next? You don't have legs so everyone around you must carry you? Too stupid to engage with. Obviously society has to accommodate (i.e. spe
117.
by tempfile 3mo ago
All the incidents I mentioned were acts of US imperialism.
118.
by tempfile 3mo ago
In Cambodia I was referring to [1] [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Freedom_Deal#Cambodi...
119.
by tempfile 3mo ago
Still 10x higher than any rational price.
120.
by tempfile 3mo ago
In the spirit of fairness I have to note the untold deaths caused by non-socialist countries in Cambodia, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, pretty much every country in South America...

More ›