temp8964

38 ms·

451.
by temp8964 5y ago
I know SMS is not 100% secure, but you can easily get SMS recovered if you lose your phone. How do you cover Authenticator if you lose your phone? I always keep both.
452.
by temp8964 5y ago
It is so impressive that you can pull something totally negative to a positive direction. Do you work for a PR team? Or a propaganda department? Chinese cities have much much less park spaces compared to the US. This is one reason for this
453.
Teachers Union Urges TikTok, Facebook, Others to Stop Spread of Viral Challenges(wsj.com)
23 points by temp8964 5y ago|8 comments
454.
by temp8964 5y ago
Like remote works?
455.
by temp8964 5y ago
Only $30k for secret military information? The couple were really desperate.
456.
by temp8964 5y ago
Hey, not just "impress", that's tons of upvotes!
457.
by temp8964 5y ago
Check Google Trends: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=X...
458.
by temp8964 5y ago
What? How is this webpage making any difference? They cancelled the event bc of Professor Abbot's past speech on DEI issues.
459.
by temp8964 5y ago
Because it’s grammatically inconsistent.
460.
by temp8964 5y ago
Please read other comments in the thread first.
461.
by temp8964 5y ago
The norm is follow the gender assumption based on the pseudonym. If the person picked a female name, everyone would happily call the person “she”, as it should be. It has nothing to do with the real person’s gender.
462.
by temp8964 5y ago
Please read other comments in the thread.
463.
by temp8964 5y ago
No. The norm is follow the gender assumption based on the pseudonym. If the person picked a female name, everyone would happily call the person “she”, as it should be.
464.
by temp8964 5y ago
No. Centuries of use for non specific person, not in this case.
465.
by temp8964 5y ago
No. The author of the article already assumed Satoshi is a singular person. Your argument is irrelevant in this context.
466.
by temp8964 5y ago
If you look at the examples, "they" are all used in a general sense not pointing to any specific individual. In this case, Satoshi is a Japanese male name. If you have evidence to suggest otherwise, there is no reason to pretend y
467.
by temp8964 5y ago
No. A technology article use they/them for a specific individual is a very new invention. Please don't make up stuff and claim this is a norm.
468.
by temp8964 5y ago
Lol. If what you said make any sense at all, why this they/them is not a norm in English already? Please explain why this is a new thing?
469.
by temp8964 5y ago
My first impression is that if you need a program to help you unfollow, you seem to have a problem already…
470.
by temp8964 5y ago
No. You are mission focused to profit and at the same time you are also serving public good. This is how the society works. You don’t have to care about any social issues at all to contribute to the society!
471.
by temp8964 5y ago
This is a win win. They don’t want you and you don’t want them. There’s nothing wrong with it. It would only seem wrong to people with authoritarian desire to force everyone to align with themselves.
472.
by temp8964 5y ago
> Maybe a dumb question, but why is the government getting into banking? I think all you need to do is considering banking as a basic human right, which can include everything. In addition, you can use race / gender / xx differ
473.
by temp8964 5y ago
Is Tesla a progressive company? And what does that mean?
474.
by temp8964 5y ago
Lol. This is not a reason for mandate.
475.
CDC as bad as Harvard? – – – no, but they could still do better(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points by temp8964 5y ago|0 comments
476.
by temp8964 5y ago
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2021/10/01/cdc-as-bad...
477.
by temp8964 5y ago
Where did you get that science?
478.
by temp8964 5y ago
Lol. University administrators are not virologists.
479.
by temp8964 5y ago
Andrew Gelman has a blog post about this misleading report: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2021/10/01/cdc-as-bad...
480.
by temp8964 5y ago
> In any context, it seems pretty reasonable to place an employee on paid leave while that employee is in the process of suing you! It doesn't seem reasonable to me at all.

More ›