Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tekknik
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
I stopped reading after 3 words. You’re clearly part of an anti-US campaign. Your response warrants no further interaction.
62.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
This is more hogwash with the statement: > It's equipped for the taliban, not nations with fleets of air craft carriers. The US has more carriers than all other nations combined, times 2. > The US does not have the manufacturing
63.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
Even your definition seems overly broad, as being arrested is pretrial detention and only requires a spoken word from the officer.
64.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
I’m not sure how this really refutes or supports anything, it’s just random noise.
65.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
> I'm claiming that the alleged air superiority is most likely partial and temporary. This is rich. It took minutes to claim the air over Iran, what exactly gives you the impression of strength? Two US carriers parked off the coast
66.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
I stopped reading after 100 bombs capacity. They are purpose built bombs, we don’t stockpile them as we don’t hit iranian mountain target regularly enough. The US spends more on military than most of the rest of the world combined. Every co
67.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
I accept this philosophy, as this is the correct way a functioning democracy operates. Independents and Republicans are tired of the riots, the attempts at forcing ideals (such as forcing the use of pronouns, forcing deviation from one’s re
68.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
There is no constitutional crisis, stop gaslighting as if the dems do not stop attempting to force their ideals then you will see more of this “constitutional crisis” as you call it.
69.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
It bothers me when other software devs assume everybody is the same as them. In CA, sure likely most engineers are likely democrats. This does not mean they’re the majority. In fact many republican devs are still scared to speak out because
70.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
Care to elaborate?
71.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
Please no AI interpreting sentiment in emails, the error rate / hallucinations at that scale would be dangerous.
72.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
At one point they took the roof off of a building because they were taking too long. Another, they changed their diet to bread and water. In one instance they stopped their pay until they decided. You should look into the history of choosin
73.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
Maybe because I don’t want multiple editors and/or subscriptions. Give me one that does it all.
74.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
So you’re missing quite a bit of data. BNSF has pension liabilities and took a small loss there last year. Additionally BNSF has only about $500mil of cash reserves and just pushed another near $3bil in maintenance and investment that’s not
75.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
You ignored my post.
76.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
So if those multiple sources are all biased, like news media tends to be, then really you’re masquerading as having balanced sources that prove your point yet they’re all biased. Right?
77.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
How does showing sources equate to correctness? If you use false or biased sources then the problem still exists yes?
78.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
How can you not have a monopoly over something you create?
79.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
for the record I like Grandpa Buffet, but this statement made by rich people is vomit inducing. If they are so eager to pay more, why not donate the money to the gov? Or instead why not take the money they would’ve donated and distribute it
80.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
Lets not forget higher taxes! > Democrats passed ACA, which made insurance even possible to purchase if you weren’t offered it by employer, and the annual out of pocket maximum, ban on pre existing conditions as a criteria for calculatin
81.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
I propose another hypothesis, those that haven’t learned of the desire for real change instead of stagnant leadership will continue to make the same mistake each election cycle. Learn to read the signs instead of calling people stupid for n
82.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
We should extend this logic of accountability. If your kid does something wrong every living parent and grandparent should be held accountable. The world would instantly be better. Not sarcasm.
83.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
Where do you get your data on BNSF? The data I have shows you’re off by a factor of near 5.
84.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
there are quite a few examples of software built with electron that have very large user bases. this sounds like a personal vendetta against electron rather than meaningful insight.
85.
▲
by
tekknik
1y ago
I always found terminology like this refreshing. You don’t need to know it for 99% of interactions and really only need to know it if you’re building formulae. But what’s with all the engineers complaining because someone made a fun project
86.
▲
by
tekknik
2y ago
crazy thought, maybe a $1 item shouldn’t be shipped from overseas at great expense to the environment? 5 years ago all anybody would talk about is the environment and now people are burning down EVs and complaining that they’ll have to pay
87.
▲
by
tekknik
2y ago
interestingly though, unless it’s plastic clothes, anything made of plastic doesn’t fall into the needs category since you can’t eat it and it isn’t durable enough to make a house out of. so what cheap plastic brush is keeping people alive?
88.
▲
by
tekknik
2y ago
write an executive summary if you expect me to read this. this is not a blog platform.
89.
▲
by
tekknik
2y ago
does anybody in this thread actually know what skeet means? i’m laughing as well at the idea of a bunch of people thinking they’re getting back at twitter by skeeting on the internet.
90.
▲
by
tekknik
2y ago
i have a problem with abuse of a system yes. I also have a problem with illegal immigrants. do you think trying to confuse and argue the point is going to change my or anybody’s mind? america first, what’s hard to understand there?
More ›