tekknik

51 ms·

811.
by tekknik 4y ago
San Francisco also has a tax issue, on both the companies and the workers. Parents point (I believe) is there is no longer a force pushing you to live in the city, especially in tech and with WFH. So if businesses and employees no longer ha
812.
by tekknik 4y ago
I don’t think the cost of plumbing is the issue. SF has very high cost of living, not just in housing but in everything. Couple that with the loss of freedoms (SF has laws that the rest of CA doesn’t have, like menthol cigarettes being ille
813.
by tekknik 4y ago
I think those of us who haven’t bought a house are rooting for it (the entire housing market, I’ll never live in SF so I don’t particularly care what happens in that city) to fall, but then think of the many people who will now be upside do
814.
by tekknik 4y ago
Let’s see, last time I was there: 1) Saw a woman slip in urine on the sidewalk, she fell on the sidewalk and broke open skin while touching the urine. 2) Someone non-chelatly smoking crack on the sidewalk, ensuring they blow the smoke in th
815.
by tekknik 4y ago
Don’t group all white collar workers with those in SF. Some of us have been offered lucrative jobs in that city and turned them down because of what’s going on up there. The ones you should be mad at are those paying $4000/mo to live i
816.
by tekknik 4y ago
I’m far from an expert here, but as I understand it there is no repeated, or daily dose of the psilocybin. Instead it physically changes your brain. Here’s one study: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/2/835&#x
817.
by tekknik 4y ago
I’m not sure how any of this stops Russians from shooting at you. > But also recognize that just because someone doesn't have the answer to everything doesn't mean it is wrong. We can all want and wish for things, at some point
818.
by tekknik 4y ago
Not the parent, but yes absolutely. If I can’t speak out against things I don’t like then I am not living. You can hole up and wait out the nuke tossing then join the workers party rebuilding their palaces after you come out. Your children
819.
by tekknik 4y ago
So let’s bring this out of the theoretical realm and into reality. How does this apply to the current Ukraine / Russian war? What is the better way to thwart Russias illegal advance?
820.
by tekknik 4y ago
Humans are built with a solution to violence, along with every other animal on the planet. Actively seeking violence and defending yourself are very different thinks and since this is instinctual, I find it very implausible you can convince
821.
by tekknik 4y ago
There’s also a large quantity of people that feel he did nothing wrong. It’s generally the left, some independents and a few republicans that think he’s horrible.
822.
by tekknik 4y ago
Well then you’re still wrong. US republicans believe in small government, so they don’t think they should even be there.
823.
by tekknik 4y ago
You remove your desire from making the absolute amount of money, then devote yourself to get compensation via experience. Do this for some years. You’ll end up in a better place with no degree than those with one.
824.
by tekknik 4y ago
Absolutely incorrect. Big firms hire “jack of all trades” devs as well to fill the gaps of the “experts”. I’ve worked with masters degree holders at very large firms that can’t even explain how DNS works. Deep domain knowledge puts you in a
825.
by tekknik 4y ago
> There's no such thing as the standard legal definition, most terms, including these, have multiple definitions. That is just blatantly false. Most terms get their legal definitions from case law, or other laws. They are purposeful
826.
by tekknik 4y ago
How does one person think they know more than the group of people involved in writing it? Your ego is quite strong. There are no gramatical errors in 2A or any right. None of the terms used are ambiguously defined, try using a legal diction
827.
by tekknik 4y ago
Oh sure they did. If the assumption that gun owners weren’t doing something wrong then the subject wouldn’t come up.
828.
by tekknik 4y ago
Militia has a legal definition, as does arms. Bearing them seems clear to me, ability to use them. Free states are not free to ignore any right enumerated, so that’s a no brainer, same with the loss of rights. If 2A is ambiguously worded be
829.
by tekknik 4y ago
I’ve seen some properties like this. What they didn’t tell you is there is no road access, you’re surrounded by gov land (and they want your plot to finish the set), and you generally won’t be able to access the land without an easement. Th
830.
by tekknik 4y ago
What is the definition of too much land? If I save up for my entire life making $100k a year across the family and buy 100acres should the gov be able to tax me off that land?
831.
by tekknik 4y ago
How would it? The emotional connection comes from the memories made in that home. You’re still raising kids, still growing up in these homes. So my guess is no.
832.
by tekknik 4y ago
You could’ve left the color of the skin of the neighbor out and still made your point. People of all skin colors face discrimination these days, not just blacks.
833.
by tekknik 4y ago
Singapore has them as well.
834.
by tekknik 4y ago
How is the second amendment ambiguous? It’s one of the more clear written rights we have.
835.
by tekknik 4y ago
Why does this control discussion lead to guns more often than not? Why can the anti-gunners not accept that guns are not going anywhere anytime soon? You will not get 2/3’s of the states to listen to you inferring gun owners are crimin
836.
by tekknik 4y ago
You’re saying, in so many words, the more similar people are to each other the happier they are. This is the definition of sheeple.
837.
by tekknik 4y ago
As sarcastic as this is, you still end up with the same just less intensity. If statistics and estimation are involved, this proposed happiness index will leave some behind and end up with everybody the same.
838.
North Korea's Crypto Hackers Are Paving the Road to Nuclear Armageddon(cnet.com)
2 points by tekknik 4y ago|0 comments
839.
by tekknik 4y ago
theft is loss of value. either way the fact remains, Bitcoin is difficult to insure due to its scarcity. If I insure 1 BTC now worth $10k then in 20 years or so (or maybe overnight) it jumps to $1mil. The insurance company hasn’t gotten eno
840.
by tekknik 4y ago
> Unlike email, the Fediverse hasn't been captured by a few large organisations. So long as we take measures to ensure that this doesn't happen, "go somewhere else" will always be a viable solution to complaints about

More ›