tekknik

38 ms·

511.
by tekknik 3y ago
So because some people can’t afford property we should control speech?
512.
by tekknik 3y ago
Maybe we should get rid of the 2 party system?
513.
by tekknik 3y ago
Your first two examples are fraud, not speech. Your third example is speech, but if you remove the mugger and have a friend say the same thing to you it becomes a joke.
514.
by tekknik 3y ago
Yea marine one could, fair enough.
515.
by tekknik 3y ago
> You can set up a schedule to train non-coms in 2-3 months, that doesn't mean they'll be very good. Experience is extremely valuable at this level. This one statement means you don’t know what you’re talking about. Non commiss
516.
by tekknik 3y ago
Then how do you know the status of the stockpiles?
517.
by tekknik 3y ago
You can train non commissioned officers in a matter of months (like 2-3). And during WW2 the US was pushing out 3 ships per day. If you focus efforts, it doesn’t take long at all.
518.
by tekknik 3y ago
Tactical nuclear weapons are very low yield bombs. You won’t start nuclear armageddon with those.
519.
by tekknik 3y ago
The Afghans would like a word with you.
520.
by tekknik 3y ago
You’re not suggesting AF1 can actually land on a carrier are you?
521.
by tekknik 3y ago
We’re talking about the US, not Australia.
522.
by tekknik 3y ago
if you live in manhattan, but this isn’t punishing those people is it?
523.
by tekknik 3y ago
you pretty well ignored the question and answered one nobody asked.
524.
by tekknik 3y ago
I mean I wouldn’t expect someone at a boot camp to understand this nor was this a topic of conversation, so /shrug?
525.
by tekknik 3y ago
> Irresponsible arguments that I would totally not be surprised to hear to push in the opposite direction: I don’t disagree with some of your statements, but why are you trying to preemptively shut the conversation down?
526.
by tekknik 3y ago
If only people thought this way about guns, where the overwhelming majority causes no problems yet <1% are insane so some people try to ban them for everybody.
527.
by tekknik 3y ago
That’s a bit different, but still a head scratcher. You can never go to a museum and still be capable of going to work. You need a car for work most of the time.
528.
by tekknik 3y ago
That’s the next step isn’t it? With EVs being near useless outside of city centers and city centers are beginning to charge congestion fees then it’s quite obvious what’s coming next.
529.
by tekknik 3y ago
The hidden magic is adjusting env vars used by python, LD, etc. Adjusting paths only seems like magic until you understand what it’s doing. I’ve done with with plenty of languages including C/C++
530.
by tekknik 3y ago
It’s interesting to me in a free country that you also pay vehicle registration (this is supposed to cover your taxes on road use) that taxes like this are a thing.
531.
by tekknik 3y ago
> If the POS is down at the store, the cell phone networks are surely down (since many POS these days are just cellphones attached to Stripe or similar) People have calculators that tend to work and be accurate outside a POS. Many people
532.
by tekknik 3y ago
> People just like the convenience, and cash is on its way out. My favorite question that many of the people on this site love to ignore, what about natural disasters? Do you believe CC terminals still work when the rest of the infrastru
533.
by tekknik 3y ago
Do you believe nuclear or conventional weapons choose only military targets when they explode? Do you believe standing in any major city that you are safe from any kind of bomb? Or are we going to play the game of “it hasn’t happened yet”?
534.
by tekknik 3y ago
And I’ve been in an actual warzone in an enemy country, that doesn’t change that they’re enemies
535.
by tekknik 3y ago
Potentially listen to the threats coming from all 3 countries?
536.
by tekknik 3y ago
What experience, metrics, literally any data are you basing this on? Do you believe Russia is a current enemy of the US? How about North Korea and China?
537.
by tekknik 3y ago
Fact checks were rarely, if ever used prior to Trump, and are rarely if ever used after Trump. And interestingly Biden’s lies, which are clear if you’re not on the left (read an independent or the right) never get covered. For instance, a r
538.
by tekknik 3y ago
Fact checks are sensationalist. Remember they were used primarily to go after Trump, and have been rarely used since. They also tend to be biased. I think it would be better to add a “how much it matters” weight to news, so this wouldn’t ev
539.
by tekknik 3y ago
Why the /s? That was spot on.
540.
by tekknik 3y ago
Does this mean Dominion will release their source code?

More ›