tehlike

62 ms·

961.
by tehlike 6y ago
No, this is within the framework - the buyer (say, amazon) wants to target you since you recently bought something. They could say they don't want to target you since you already bought it, but it's partly up to them. FB/Goog
962.
by tehlike 6y ago
This assumes the continuity of EU as a union. I would not really count on it.
963.
by tehlike 6y ago
This one is also interesting. I might not be old enough to remember something like this, even old times circa 1990s installments would let you have the item immediately, but be paid over time. The PoS thing i am talking about was even befor
964.
by tehlike 6y ago
This brings back memories from about a year ago when i was doing robotics. Azure Kinect DK depth cameras had a firmware/hardware issue that would let it get stuck every now and then, and it would have to be power cycled. You'd im
965.
by tehlike 6y ago
affirm is one of those things that was pretty interesting. Coming from a country where micro-installments at PoS was standard, i always thought it was really interesting the US didn't have it. Good for them, I'll be buying shortly
966.
by tehlike 6y ago
I do know there are games worth paying 60 bucks for. Also worth games worth a few buck. I normally don't play games, but the thought of having to make pyments every single time is too much for me personally.
967.
by tehlike 6y ago
>"I bought that new power tool last week. Stop showing me the ad for the tool from the same store I already bought it from." Yes. I hate this too, but think of it as a bug, not the actual intention. We would love to know when y
968.
by tehlike 6y ago
"some can be" and "all are" are different things. There are a lot of businesses that don't keep track of their finances, just like there are many people who don't. But assuming that's de-facto situation an
969.
by tehlike 6y ago
Advertisers don't give a damn what advertising is "most relevant" to me. -> They certainly do, indirectly - that'd mean they get better ROI on their investment. But think of it this way. You are getting a service, yo
970.
by tehlike 6y ago
You are taking "you" as literal you. Not everyone is literal you. IAP revenue probably is on par with or more than ads. But ads is on top of that. There's a difference.
971.
by tehlike 6y ago
Browsers (starting with apple) and regulations (ccpa etc) will give you a choice. The area is ripe for disruption. But sadly, that's the world we have to live in. I am pretty sure google would have prefered if you paid for the services
972.
by tehlike 6y ago
I did. "tracking is getting them better/ more relevant advertising" -> it makes it more relavant yes. But your individual experience on 100 impressions don't matter. Us showing you ads for something you already bought
973.
by tehlike 6y ago
Feel free to pay money, I applaud that. For the content you benefit from, if you are willing to pay, that's amazing. I do pay for content too (i have yt premium, netflix, blutv etc). But not everyone wants to pay for the content. You c
974.
by tehlike 6y ago
It's fairly easy to prove. Businesses are not dumb. Why would they throw their money on advertising otherwise?
975.
by tehlike 6y ago
Lie & scam - big words. Ads/marketing budgets create employment that would otherwise not be there. Ads provide monetization for apps you use on your phone. Without monetization you wouldn't have the proliferation of the ads, a
976.
by tehlike 6y ago
Apple didn't lose much by reducing commission to 15%, when they are top heavy, anyways. Based on one of the articles (not sure about how trustable data was, though), while the new commission effects 98% of developers, the net revenue i
977.
by tehlike 6y ago
The meme that never dies. There are 1 billion users, each of which spend x$ on the platform. The recommendation system does not need to get 100% accurate (it'd be very hard to get to something that 10% nonaccidental/nonfraud click
978.
by tehlike 6y ago
I presume you will pay for the overage
979.
by tehlike 6y ago
You are correct. It needs to be anonymous, untamperable, auditable. I recently had a discussion with a friend who asked me how to implement a write only audit log that will comply with some finra regulation. I asked him how tamper proof it
980.
by tehlike 6y ago
Mandatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2030/
981.
by tehlike 6y ago
i was mostly talking about reading side, not mutation side.
982.
by tehlike 6y ago
People are downvoting you, mostly because you are making a big deal out of a very simple situation. As one commenter said above, they would either get nothing, or nothing, and the VC firm, through the publicity they are getting now, will ve
983.
by tehlike 6y ago
It can eagerload more complex queries. If you are eagerloading multiple joins relationships, normally that would create a result set of n x m x k x ... rows. With json_agg each relation could be single column in a row etc.
984.
by tehlike 6y ago
Postgres supports json_agg which solves n+1 and also cartesian product problem. It's neat, hasura does it nicely for example.
985.
by tehlike 6y ago
Hah, likely true.
986.
by tehlike 6y ago
it won't dry up.
987.
by tehlike 6y ago
Google acquired android for 50m$.
988.
by tehlike 6y ago
I feel similar for android.
989.
by tehlike 6y ago
I am afraid of google killing it eventually. I wonder if there's an alternative. Interestingly, Google Voice is now part of gcloud, so there might still be some hope for it.
990.
Kraken – P2P Docker Registry(github.com)
84 points by tehlike 6y ago|14 comments

More ›