Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tefkah
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
> These aren't edge cases. They're normal problems you hit building moderately complex apps These aren’t real articles. They’re slopg diatribes generated by people who can’t even be bothered to communicate a thought. I feel ann
62.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
> This piece isn’t about reinventing the wheel. It’s about understanding why we’re not using the wheel we already have— common man please just write the text yourself
63.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
Internet's biggest annoyance: AI slop blogposts
64.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
> But the thing is – nalgebra isn't an isolated example. It’s cultural. classic llmism
65.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
i didn’t take the advice as “ask your doctor whether this is a good idea” (I also doubt the average GP’s ability to say anything useful about nutrition) but more as “keep your doctor in the loop of doing a weird diet and do regular check-up
66.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
> This isn't just a new version — it's a new direction. One that's faster, simpler, and closer to the web itself. people really just be raw posting whatever chatgpt spits out huh
67.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
really hope they add to the fine for this, seems like Apple never learns.
68.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
Are you regularly dealing with people with compromised immune systems? If not, why isn’t just washing them good enough? Semi-related: all the Americans I know who live here (in the Netherlands) tend to use way more aggressive cleaning produ
69.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
that's an http 1.1 only limitation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Server-sent...
70.
▲
by
tefkah
1y ago
evil technology
71.
▲
by
tefkah
2y ago
impressed to be reading an article from the future
72.
▲
by
tefkah
2y ago
hjalsberg has explained this in some interviews. roughly 3x speed up from going native, another 3-4x speed up from being able to actually do effective multi threading
73.
▲
by
tefkah
2y ago
shallow AI ass article, i’m betting i’d get the exact same if i’d ask an llm to write me an article about postgres best practices
74.
▲
by
tefkah
2y ago
so trueeee! science is ofc a zero-sum game, and we should stifle competition and collaboration as much as possible. how else will i get that 3rd citation on my phd thesis? /s
75.
▲
by
tefkah
2y ago
Disagree, as we also publish “failed” research, where authors reflect on their experiment, such that others may learn from it, and that the others may still gain something useful academically from this (citations, a publication). One of our
76.
▲
by
tefkah
2y ago
I run a journal where we publish both “real” null results and experiments were something practical went wrong, so i have a few thoughts: 1. Ideally peer review would catch this. A badly setup study should be critiqued in peer review. Forcin
77.
▲
by
tefkah
2y ago
You could publish it in the Journal of Trial and Error ( https://journal.trialanderror.org ), which I created with a number of colleagues a couple years ago! Our editor-in-chief was interviewed for this related Nature article a co