Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tech-no-logical
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
91.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
I don't block cookies by default and acko.net doesn't offer me any. it does however cause firefox to notice me of an insecure javascript operation.
92.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
I guess the site itself avoids the dom by being non-functional in my latest firefox. well done, I say.
93.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
close, the netherlands.
94.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
this youtube video is not available in your location this deezer song is not available in your country this youtube video contains content from [x]. it is restricted from playback on certain sites. on the first three clicks.
95.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
I'm not, I'm always zooming out on those hipster sites. So I guess both paradigms are incorrect.
96.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
the site won't even show it's content without javascript. probably because of the wordpress theme they use...
97.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
first thing I did to make it readable was hitting "ctrl -" three times. so the site kind of defeats itself in that respect. I agree that there's an optimal number of characters per line, but it doesn't necessarily mean y
98.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
> [...] send Ghostery into the abyss [...]. I want the web to work like it’s intended to 99% of the time and I know how to control my privacy the remaining 1% of the time. You don’t need a plugin for that. I want to control my privacy 99
99.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
that was it. the rest of the menu gives me nothing, the random button works fine :) great stuff.
100.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
would probably be awesome (love SID tunes), but I get noting in latest firefox beta, nothing in latest chrome, nothing in latest opera, and nothing in internet explorer 11. my guess there's something wrong.
101.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
the fancy logo on that site gives me a "SecurityError: The operation is insecure." error in latest FF beta, resulting in a black background. apart from that the site works like a charm, but it's virtually unreadable.
102.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
From twilio : > When you use our [...] services Twilio may collect from you the following personally identifiable information: [...] and phone number. [...] Twilio may keep a cached copy of the content you serve us as a part of your use
103.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
I use a 24" 1920x1200 monitor, nothing special, and it's about 50cm from my eyes. I'm in my 40s, so anything real close (< 25cm) is hard to read without reading glasses, but otherwise my eyesight is fine. Don't know a
104.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
Yet another blogging platform for which I need to use 'ctrl -', resulting in a content-width of less than 600 pixels, which looks ridiculous on a modern monitor. I still don't get the 'large print' trend. Yes, I
105.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
if you want to introduce a product, please, please supply a working demo, and not some bad video full of marketing. _especially_ if you're targeting developers.
106.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
seriously, why ? are our eyes getting worse ? have centuries of publishers gotten it wrong all this time, and should everything have been 'large print' edition from the start ? I'm 40+ and I should probably wear glasses for r
107.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
nice effect, but suffers from 'medium disease'. font size is 'unreadably' big, I find it very difficult to read such texts on my normal 1920x1200 24" monitor.
108.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
with regard to most people with a grain insight this article is all about stating the obvious, albeit in very big letters. I agree nonetheless. apart from the 'give me your passwords' example, that's not what privacy is about
109.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
funny, I'm browsing with latest opera with some plugins (notably addblock plus and disconnect) and I can read everything without logging in and without adding the ?share=1 still not using that site though. edit : my mistake. it seems t
110.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
this is the ugliest use of an attribute value I've ever seen. this needs to follow the way of the dodo, as quickly as possible.
111.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
the site also impressively shows that this leads to horrendously large font-sizes on a normal (1920x1200) monitor. it looks like medium on steroids, and makes the site scream at me like there's no tomorrow. I don't know where this
112.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
that looks very good, but navigating with the 'back' button breaks the app. tested on FF24 / opera 15.
113.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
if they're ever going to do ads, you know it'll be in a fancy 48px font screaming at you...
114.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
our minister (Ivo Opstelten) has just said that he hasn't had any complaints concerning prism. probably because it was a secret... duh... the way our (as in netherlands and EU) politicians are responding to these issues are so laughabl
115.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
13y ago
pity it does nothing in opera but show the can, and I wore out my mousewheel by scrolling to slide 2 in firefox. probably just tested in safari. preaching to their own choir I guess.
116.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
14y ago
most of those would be equally silly if they had a space between the two words. if "my space" was a brand, would they _really_ be able to forbid me to publish a book called "my space and time" based on that trademark ? if they actually coul
117.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
14y ago
another reminder : if you're starting a brand, DO NOT simply throw together two generic words and expect to be able to hold on to your trademark. this is just silly.
118.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
14y ago
he initially demanded the subreddit change its name, which is technically hard to do, or so people from reddit said, which would mean the subreddit was to be deleted. he was never to be 'stripped' of something he built, the site and the sub
119.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
14y ago
... wherein mr. vizzini is the hero who personally wrested the term 'gaymer' from the evil claws of the bigoted internet. there's enogugh references from before 2003 to prove that this is a load of bs.
120.
▲
by
tech-no-logical
14y ago
I can't find anything about it now (mr. vizzini has deleted his reddit account, so it's hard to pinpoint some things), but I sincerely doubt there ever was such an agreement.
More ›