teawrecks

10 ms·

61.
by teawrecks 4y ago
The problem is your plan hinges on you being the one and only company in your neighborhood with the "human touch". But you won't be. You'll be competing with every other human with a family who refuses to use modern tech
62.
by teawrecks 4y ago
"Sure, robot assembly units have a much higher throughput with a much lower error rate and virtually zero risk for injury, but they lack a 'human touch'. That will be our differentiating factor." Even if one manufacturer
63.
by teawrecks 4y ago
That's fair. The original post was suggesting corporations were actively using it for lower trade latency. That seems very unlikely. But having the technology in our back pocket for military use? That's believable. Though I think
64.
by teawrecks 4y ago
This is what all fediverse protocols and specs gaining traction today should be designing for. Email was lucky and got their foot in the door before the dotcom era figured out about walled gardens. Now we're slowly crawling back out of
65.
by teawrecks 4y ago
The thing is, a simple carbon tax is already designed to handle both of these cases. Burning coal/gas would have a cost proportional to the long term effects it has, and at the end of the day customers just see a price of electricity.
66.
by teawrecks 4y ago
> Run locally on browser – no need to install any applications That's not what "run locally" means. This isn't any more "local" than talking to chatgpt directly, which is never running locally.
67.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Also, git doesn't work p2p, it uses centralized servers. If i understand correctly, the only real difference between Twitter and this is that you have your data downloaded, so switching to a new platform is a matter of adding a new rem
68.
by teawrecks 4y ago
We would see decisions being made that aren't physically possible with current technology. Also the number of people who would need to keep something like this a secret would be on par with that of a fake moon landing. If their applica
69.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Leopards Eating your Face party votes to eat your face.
70.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Wait what does GIGO have to do with it, the input and output were both reasonable.
71.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Your point seems unrelated.
72.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Someone below mentioned that the important part isn't that it tiles aperiodically, but that it ONLY tiles aperiodically. There are simpler shapes that will tile both aperiodically and periodically.
73.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Your comment only applies to the LLMs of today. Consider how much more bullshit the best natural language bot generated 10 years ago. The bullshit produced is dropping at an incredible rate. In a few short years we could very well have high
74.
by teawrecks 4y ago
If only there was a non-profit that developed AI for open source use. A sort of "open AI" foundation...
75.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Just sound like reasons to not get a dell.
76.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Correct. The original phrasing is a question of universality, the new phrasing is one of existence. Gpt4 continued to explain the joke in terms of the former when it should have been able to adjust for the latter. It has never heard the lat
77.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Yes. And as long as this relationship only works in this direction, China has no incentive to cooperate. If Chinese citizens were also able to buy US products for cheap because they used Chinese tech while ignoring licenses, then China woul
78.
by teawrecks 4y ago
We would be operating under the assumption that our current licensing law is ideal. Meanwhile, China/other countries will benefit from new products that we are too principled to use. Over time, what do you think will happen to the half
79.
by teawrecks 4y ago
For distros marketed as desktop alternatives to windows or mac, it means a lot, because most of those users are going to install and run it without changing much at all. Especially if it comes preinstalled on a budget laptop.
80.
by teawrecks 4y ago
> like going to the worse University out there. ...without going anywhere. Wikipedia isn't great compared to a degree from a top university, but it's also readily available and is often a first reference for many of us.
81.
by teawrecks 4y ago
There's proof everywhere that this world is just an incredibly detailed simulation. Even if you inspect the tiniest grain of sand, the simulation is such high resolution that you simply can't tell it apart from a real world. Just
82.
by teawrecks 4y ago
I wonder how long before we augment a human brain with gpt4.
83.
by teawrecks 4y ago
By and large, the ones who ran aren't the ones who were hurt.
84.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Banking isn't intended to be a risk, though. That's literally the point of FDIC insurance. Idk why I'm even bothering making an argument when your opening argument is ad hominem.
85.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Right, which is literally the argument against a small set of giant "too big to fail" banks.
86.
by teawrecks 4y ago
Wait so, you're in favor of the bank being bailed out here? The phrase "too big to fail" doesn't mean it's impossible for it to fail; that's not a thing. It means the govt/public feeling obligated to bail
87.
by teawrecks 4y ago
This statement doesn't make sense to me: > Its against the interest of the greater economy to bail out those who didnt take any risk either. Because it socializes the risk while privatizing the reward. In the first sentence you say
88.
by teawrecks 4y ago
I agree, but still, I don't think it was appropriate for the judge to approve this warrant. Just because person X is suspected of a crime doesn't justify a search/seizure from person Y who just happens to be nearby at the tim
89.
by teawrecks 4y ago
I think the sentiment is more that we should optimize for the wellbeing of people; i.e. the wellbeing of companies should only optimized to the degree that it contributes to the wellbeing of people.
90.
by teawrecks 4y ago
> They behave as 2nm transistors would behave in terms of spec. And how do 2nm transistors behave?

More ›