tcoff91

15 ms·

211.
by tcoff91 1y ago
There’s no way within web standards to match iOS native api UX. Even on Android where you have chrome as the mobile browser you can’t match it. Even if you could ship chrome renderer on iOS you won’t be able to make a mobile web app feel as
212.
by tcoff91 1y ago
It seems to me like one obvious improvement is for npm to require 2fa to submit packages. The fact that malware can just automatically publish packages without a human having to go through an MFA step is crazy.
213.
by tcoff91 1y ago
20 of the packages were from Crowdstrike
214.
by tcoff91 1y ago
Source? An open source library is not necessarily a ‘product’ at all.
215.
by tcoff91 1y ago
With the New Architecture & Expo, react native is in a great state right now and is gaining momentum. We've been able to onboard a lot of web devs onto working on our new Expo universal app at my employer and only a small subset of
216.
by tcoff91 1y ago
Yeah but the UI is webviews. It's not as native as React Native.
217.
by tcoff91 1y ago
There’s literally only one time this has happened in react native and it took 8 years to finish being built and roll out completely.
218.
by tcoff91 1y ago
They are close to finally stabilizing the API (as much is possible given underlying platform stability). New Architecture has been in the works for 8 years. It’s such a massive upgrade over legacy architecture. Migrating our app to new arch
219.
by tcoff91 1y ago
It’s good enough that the ecosystem outweighs the superiority of something like SolidJS. React has React Native as part of its ecosystem. That’s a massive advantage. react-strict-dom is going to be a game changer for the development of univ
220.
by tcoff91 1y ago
A great native app on an iPhone feels far superior to a mobile website. The gestures, the stack navigator, haptics, scrolling, native ui primitives, etc… Also iOS accessibility screen reader APIs are way better than the web. Accessibility a
221.
by tcoff91 1y ago
There’s nothing wrong with discussing moving away from native apps and their very real downsides. I was merely offering data showing that the vast majority of people do not share this sentiment, and one would be wise when launching a produc
222.
by tcoff91 1y ago
You need the BEAM because operating systems we have available do not have the properties of the BEAM. OS processes are far to heavy and slow to start, and the scheduler doesn’t work the way erlang needs it to. The BEAM solves those issues a
223.
by tcoff91 1y ago
This is a site mostly centered around startups and building products. I notice a common anti-mobile-app sentiment here, and the criticisms are valid, but I think that it’s important to keep in mind that for many apps having a mobile app is
224.
by tcoff91 1y ago
On average 90% of time spent on mobile devices is in native apps.
225.
by tcoff91 1y ago
For reviewing PRs I use Octo.nvim
226.
by tcoff91 1y ago
The main thing that makes it more powerful imo is that you can accomplish insane rebases with 1 command that would be really difficult with git. Like let’s say you have 4 separate PRs in review that have no dependency on each other. You the
227.
by tcoff91 1y ago
That seems perfectly fine and noncontroversial then. Good on Apple for doing it that way.
228.
by tcoff91 1y ago
You have to opt in and set up a language server
229.
by tcoff91 1y ago
It’s just native support for ghost text. It’s not llm specific
230.
by tcoff91 1y ago
Neovim and Emacs don’t have it built in. Use open source tools.
231.
by tcoff91 1y ago
moonrepo is pretty nice
232.
by tcoff91 1y ago
‘Claude Code’ refers to the CLI.
233.
by tcoff91 1y ago
Community game servers are the greatest man. So lame how most games don’t support this now.
234.
by tcoff91 1y ago
Meanwhile it’s incompatible with other kernel-mode anti cheat. I hate this new world of rootkitting your pc to game
235.
by tcoff91 1y ago
If you aren’t using a client that automatically uses the context of your repos then you don’t understand why people like Claude. You need to use the Claude Code CLI in order to really get the best results.
236.
by tcoff91 1y ago
Carbon capture is probably the only geoengineering thing you could do that isn’t going to be massively controversial. Probably not practical though. The other options mentioned like messing with the atmosphere to make it reflect more heat i
237.
by tcoff91 1y ago
The moment anyone tries anything on that scale of geoengineering, they will immediately be blamed for whatever weather-based natural disasters that follow. I just don’t see how this can work without creating massive diplomatic tensions.
238.
by tcoff91 1y ago
Site isn’t working for me on iOS safari.
239.
by tcoff91 1y ago
Yeah but with jj it rebases all the like side quest experimental anonymous branches too. In git rebase is a list of commits to be picked. In jj it is just so much more powerful. In git you can’t rebase all 4 parallel PRs you have in flight
240.
by tcoff91 1y ago
It’s really nice to use the —-first-parent flag with bisect.

More ›