Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tbodt
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
31.
▲
by
tbodt
5y ago
Nice
32.
▲
Google is testing its new ad targeting tech in millions of browsers
(eff.org)
115 points
by
tbodt
6y ago
|
90 comments
33.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/360004109911 They have a switch to turn this off, but then they say this: > The nitty gritty: when you turn the flag off, the events are sent, but we tell our
34.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
The only reason I use Backblaze instead of tarsnap is it is 62 times cheaper for the same amount of storage. tarsnap is dramatically overpriced if you ask me.
35.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
This doesn't load for me for some reason. This works better: http://web.archive.org/web/20210315224524/https://lucky225.m...
36.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
I've never seen anyone look into just why Go forces a GC on 2 minute intervals. The code originally appeared in https://codereview.appspot.com/5451057 and there's a bit of discussion on https://groups
37.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
idevicerestore will eventually support doing this from Linux.
38.
▲
How does Clang 2.7 hold up in 2021?
(gist.github.com)
163 points
by
tbodt
6y ago
|
32 comments
39.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
Can you help convince me of this? Also I'd encourage you to contact the owners of the repositories listed in Google's DMCA notice against the Widevine cryptographic key and help them file a counter-notice. https://githu
40.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
Aside from being illegal, defeating the various layers of obfuscation and extracting the private keys requires a very particular set of skills, beyond the reach of most programmers. And then they'll just rotate the key and add more obf
41.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
That tweet is not accurate, but DDOS-Guard is a Russian firm according to https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/01/hamas-may-be-threat-to-8...
42.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
To me that was never the problem. The problem is joining data that doesn't need to be joined.
43.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
Which site guideline does this break?
44.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
Probably not. But the timing is strange to me
45.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
Announced only 4 hours after responding to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25644056 ? That can't be a coincidence.
46.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
I would say the right place for the performance team to apply resources is looking for bugs or missed optimizations that affect everything or nearly everything on the site. Everything is uniformly slow, so there must be a lot of this.
47.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
There's also Adobe Animate, which is a rebranding of Flash that can output HTML/JS
48.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
tenpo sike suno sin o pona tawa ali!
49.
▲
macOS EULA licensing restrictions affecting virtualisation
(threedots.ovh)
1 points
by
tbodt
6y ago
|
0 comments
50.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
iMessage is not being attacked because it's not as sandboxed as other apps. It's being attacked because it's accessible with zero clicks. For an attack like this you need to chain an iMessage exploit with an LPE, and the LPE
51.
▲
The Museum of Borgmon Abstract Art
(sre.google)
1 points
by
tbodt
6y ago
|
0 comments
52.
▲
Plea to Twitter
(christine.website)
1 points
by
tbodt
6y ago
|
0 comments
53.
▲
Fontcase: Font Installer for iOS
(blog.iconfactory.com)
1 points
by
tbodt
6y ago
|
0 comments
54.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
Yes, please make a post sharing your knowledge on how to convince them. I suspect most people would have no idea how to pull this off.
55.
▲
Expanding Fuchsia's open source model
(opensource.googleblog.com)
387 points
by
tbodt
6y ago
|
323 comments
56.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
The build execution bits of Travis appear to be open source: https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-build https://github.com/travis-ci/worker It should be possible to make a GitHub action that runs a
57.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
Anyone have a link to the original NLRB filing that is presumably the source for this article?
58.
▲
An iOS zero-click radio proximity exploit odyssey
(googleprojectzero.blogspot.com)
647 points
by
tbodt
6y ago
|
272 comments
59.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
They added 32 bit x86 support to Rosetta apparently just to get CrossOver to work. This could be a reason for them to never remove Rosetta. Maybe they'll just remove the x86 userland.
60.
▲
by
tbodt
6y ago
You'll never guess whose idea this was
More ›